Runcie C J
Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar;64(3):293-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05762.x.
The performance of trainee anaesthetists has been assessed by control chart methodology, but while assessment of consultants' performance has been suggested, published reports are rare. In order to test the value of control charts, I monitored my insertion of arterial and central venous cannulae over 3 years, documenting success or failure both for the first pass of the needle and for the intended site of cannulation. The resultant control charts clearly show episodes of changed performance. It was necessary to modify the technique used to assess trainees, specifically with relation to definitions of success, failure and 'acceptable' failure rates. The information obtained from these charts is well suited to inform an appraisal or revalidation discussion with both reflective and assessment elements.
实习麻醉医生的表现已通过控制图方法进行评估,但尽管有人建议对顾问医生的表现进行评估,但公开报告却很少见。为了检验控制图的价值,我在3年时间里监测了自己进行动脉和中心静脉置管的情况,记录了穿刺针首次穿刺以及预期置管部位的成功或失败情况。由此得出的控制图清楚地显示了表现变化的阶段。有必要修改用于评估实习生的技术,特别是在成功、失败和“可接受”失败率的定义方面。从这些图表中获得的信息非常适合为包含反思和评估要素的评估或再认证讨论提供依据。