Lange M, Frommer M, Redel A, Trautner H, Hampel J, Kranke P, Kehl F, Scholtz L U, Roewer N
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar;64(3):323-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05781.x.
Optical laryngoscopes have been developed to facilitate difficult airway management. The Airtraq is a single-use device and the GlideScope is reusable. In this study, the Airtraq and the Glidescope were compared in 60 ASA I-III patients with tumours of the upper airway undergoing direct endoscopic microlaryngoscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to the Airtraq or the Glidescope group and the Cormack and Lehane grade was assessed by Macintosh laryngoscopy prior to tracheal intubation. There were no differences in tracheal intubation success rates or duration of intubation attempts between both devices. The Cormack and Lehane grade was improved in 77% and 82% of cases in the Airtraq and Glidescope group, respectively. Blood traces on the device and traumatic pharyngeal lesions were found more frequently in the Airtraq group. The Airtraq and Glidescope laryngoscopes are valuable tools for the management of patients with potentially difficult airways with the Glidescope appearing to be less traumatic.
光学喉镜已被开发出来以方便困难气道的管理。Airtraq是一次性使用设备,而GlideScope是可重复使用的。在本研究中,对60例接受直接内镜显微喉镜检查的ASA I-III级上气道肿瘤患者的Airtraq和GlideScope进行了比较。患者被随机分配到Airtraq组或GlideScope组,并在气管插管前通过Macintosh喉镜评估Cormack和Lehane分级。两种设备在气管插管成功率或插管尝试持续时间方面没有差异。Airtraq组和GlideScope组分别有77%和82%的病例Cormack和Lehane分级得到改善。Airtraq组设备上的血迹和咽部创伤性病变更为常见。Airtraq和GlideScope喉镜是管理潜在困难气道患者的有价值工具,其中GlideScope似乎创伤较小。