Suppr超能文献

在接受直接喉镜检查的患者中比较Glidescope喉镜和Airtraq可视喉镜。

Comparison of the Glidescope and Airtraq optical laryngoscopes in patients undergoing direct microlaryngoscopy.

作者信息

Lange M, Frommer M, Redel A, Trautner H, Hampel J, Kranke P, Kehl F, Scholtz L U, Roewer N

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar;64(3):323-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05781.x.

Abstract

Optical laryngoscopes have been developed to facilitate difficult airway management. The Airtraq is a single-use device and the GlideScope is reusable. In this study, the Airtraq and the Glidescope were compared in 60 ASA I-III patients with tumours of the upper airway undergoing direct endoscopic microlaryngoscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to the Airtraq or the Glidescope group and the Cormack and Lehane grade was assessed by Macintosh laryngoscopy prior to tracheal intubation. There were no differences in tracheal intubation success rates or duration of intubation attempts between both devices. The Cormack and Lehane grade was improved in 77% and 82% of cases in the Airtraq and Glidescope group, respectively. Blood traces on the device and traumatic pharyngeal lesions were found more frequently in the Airtraq group. The Airtraq and Glidescope laryngoscopes are valuable tools for the management of patients with potentially difficult airways with the Glidescope appearing to be less traumatic.

摘要

光学喉镜已被开发出来以方便困难气道的管理。Airtraq是一次性使用设备,而GlideScope是可重复使用的。在本研究中,对60例接受直接内镜显微喉镜检查的ASA I-III级上气道肿瘤患者的Airtraq和GlideScope进行了比较。患者被随机分配到Airtraq组或GlideScope组,并在气管插管前通过Macintosh喉镜评估Cormack和Lehane分级。两种设备在气管插管成功率或插管尝试持续时间方面没有差异。Airtraq组和GlideScope组分别有77%和82%的病例Cormack和Lehane分级得到改善。Airtraq组设备上的血迹和咽部创伤性病变更为常见。Airtraq和GlideScope喉镜是管理潜在困难气道患者的有价值工具,其中GlideScope似乎创伤较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验