Suppr超能文献

仅使用光棒技术对气道困难患者进行清醒气管插管的临床评估。

Clinical assessment of awake endotracheal intubation using the lightwand technique alone in patients with difficult airways.

作者信息

Xue Fu-shan, He Nong, Liao Xu, Xu Xiu-Zheng, Xu Ya-chao, Yang Quan-yong, Luo Mao-ping, Zhang Yan-ming

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100144, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Feb 20;122(4):408-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is few study to determine whether the use of the lightwand technique alone could achieve effective, safe and successful awake endotracheal intubation (ETI), therefore we designed a prospective clinical study to systematically evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of awake ETI using the lightwand alone in patients with difficult airways.

METHODS

Seventy adult patients with difficult airways were enrolled in this study. After the desired sedation with fentanyl and midazolam, airway topical anesthesia was performed with 9 ml of 2% lidocaine, which were in order sprayed in three aliquots at 5 minutes intervals into the supraglottic (two doses) and laryngotracheal areas (one dose) using a combined unit of the lightwand and MADgic atomizer. After airway topical anesthesia, awake ETI was performed using a Lightwand. Subjective assessments by patients and operators using the visual analogue scores (VAS), and objective assessments by an independent investigator using patients' tolerance and reaction scores, coughing severity, intubating conditions and cardiovascular variables were taken as the observed parameters.

RESULTS

Of 210 airway sprays, 197 (93.8%) were successfully completed on the first attempt. The total time for airway spray was (14.6 +/- 1.5) minutes. During airway topical anesthesia, the average patients' tolerance scores were 1.7 - 2.3. After airway topical anesthesia, the mean VAS for discomfort levels that the patients reported was 6.5. Also airway topical anesthesia procedure was rated as acceptable and no discomfort by 94.3% of patients. The lightwand-guided awake ETI was successfully completed on first attempt within 29 seconds in all patients. During awake ETI, patients' reaction and coughing scores were 1.9 and 1.6, respectively. All patients exhibited excellent or acceptable intubating conditions. Cardiovascular monitoring revealed that changes of systolic blood pressure and heart rate at each stage of airway manipulations were less than 20% of baseline values. The postoperative follow-up showed that 95.7% of patients had no recall or slight memories of all airway instrumentation. The incidence of postoperative mild airway complications was 38.6%.

CONCLUSION

Alone use of the lightwand technique can achieve effective, safe and successful awake ETI in patients with difficult airways.

摘要

背景

很少有研究确定单独使用光棒技术能否实现有效、安全且成功的清醒气管插管(ETI),因此我们设计了一项前瞻性临床研究,以系统评估在困难气道患者中单独使用光棒进行清醒ETI的可行性、安全性和有效性。

方法

本研究纳入了70例成年困难气道患者。在给予芬太尼和咪达唑仑达到所需镇静效果后,用9毫升2%利多卡因进行气道表面麻醉,使用光棒和MADgic雾化器组合装置,分三次等量,每隔5分钟依次喷入声门上(两剂)和喉气管区域(一剂)。气道表面麻醉后,使用光棒进行清醒ETI。患者和操作者使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行主观评估,独立研究者使用患者的耐受和反应评分、咳嗽严重程度、插管条件和心血管变量进行客观评估,将这些作为观察参数。

结果

在210次气道喷雾中,197次(93.8%)首次尝试成功完成。气道喷雾总时间为(14.6±1.5)分钟。在气道表面麻醉期间,患者的平均耐受评分为1.7 - 2.3。气道表面麻醉后,患者报告的不适程度的平均VAS为6.5。此外,94.3%的患者对气道表面麻醉操作评价为可接受且无不适。所有患者在29秒内首次尝试成功完成光棒引导的清醒ETI。在清醒ETI期间,患者的反应和咳嗽评分分别为1.9和1.6。所有患者均表现出良好或可接受的插管条件。心血管监测显示,气道操作各阶段收缩压和心率的变化均小于基线值的20%。术后随访显示,95.7%的患者对所有气道操作无回忆或仅有轻微记忆。术后轻度气道并发症的发生率为38.6%。

结论

单独使用光棒技术可在困难气道患者中实现有效、安全且成功的清醒ETI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验