Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定与芬太尼-咪达唑仑联合应用于清醒纤维支气管镜插管镇静效果及安全性的评估:一项随机对照研究

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl-midazolam Combination on Sedation and Safety during Awake Fiberoptic Intubation: A Randomized Comparative Study.

作者信息

Yousuf Abida, Ahad Basharat, Mir Aabid Hussain, Mir Abdul Waheed, Wani Juvera Gul, Hussain Sheikh Quyoom

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):998-1003. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_150_17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) is a recommended technique for anticipated difficult airway. An ideal regime should provide patient comfort, cooperation, amnesia, hemodynamic stability, and blunt airway reflexes and maintain a patent airway with spontaneous ventilation. The aim of our study was to compare intubation conditions between dexmedetomidine and fentanyl-midazolam combination during AFOI.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized study was conducted on a total of sixty patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II of either sex, in the age group of 18-60 years having predicted difficult intubation undergoing elective surgeries and the patients were allocated to two groups of thirty patients each. After premedication and topicalization of airways, dexmedetomidine group (Group I, = 30) received dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 min and midazolam-fentanyl group (Group II, = 30) received fentanyl 2 μg/kg plus midazolam 0.02 mg/kg over 10 min. Adequacy of intubation condition was evaluated by cough score and postintubation score. Incidence of desaturation, hemodynamic changes, and sedation using Ramsay sedation scale were noted and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics were comparable in the two groups ( > 0.05). The mean Ramsay sedation score in Group I was 3.13 ± 0.937 and Group II was 3.16 ± 0.949, and the comparison between two groups was statistically insignificant ( = 0.891). Cough scores and postintubation scores were favorable in dexmedetomidine group than midazolam-fentanyl group and were statistically significant with < 0.001 and 0.0001, respectively. Group I also showed better hemodynamics and less episodes of desaturation than Group II.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine is more effective than midazolam-fentanyl during AFOI, as it provides better intubation condition, hemodynamic stability, and preservation of airway and spontaneous ventilation.

摘要

背景

清醒纤维支气管镜引导插管(AFOI)是针对预期困难气道推荐使用的技术。理想的方案应能让患者感到舒适、配合,产生遗忘作用,保持血流动力学稳定,抑制气道反射,并维持气道通畅及自主通气。我们研究的目的是比较AFOI期间右美托咪定与芬太尼-咪达唑仑联合用药的插管条件。

方法

本前瞻性随机研究共纳入60例年龄在18至60岁、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级、预计插管困难且接受择期手术的患者,将其分为两组,每组30例。在进行术前用药和气道表面麻醉后,右美托咪定组(Ⅰ组,n = 30)在10分钟内输注右美托咪定1μg/kg,咪达唑仑-芬太尼组(Ⅱ组,n = 30)在10分钟内输注芬太尼2μg/kg加咪达唑仑0.02mg/kg。通过咳嗽评分和插管后评分评估插管条件是否充分。记录并比较两组患者的血氧饱和度下降发生率、血流动力学变化以及使用Ramsay镇静评分法评估的镇静情况。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学特征具有可比性(P > 0.05)。Ⅰ组的平均Ramsay镇静评分为3.13 ± 0.937,Ⅱ组为3.16 ± 0.949,两组之间的比较无统计学意义(P = 0.891)。右美托咪定组的咳嗽评分和插管后评分均优于咪达唑仑-芬太尼组,差异具有统计学意义,P值分别< 0.001和0.0001。Ⅰ组在血流动力学方面也优于Ⅱ组,且血氧饱和度下降的情况更少。

结论

在AFOI期间,右美托咪定比咪达唑仑-芬太尼更有效,因为它能提供更好的插管条件、血流动力学稳定性,并能维持气道通畅和自主通气。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d8/5735502/38adabe2507c/AER-11-998-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验