Division of Phoniatrics and Logopedics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
J Voice. 2010 Mar;24(2):153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.07.007. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
Only limited data on normal vocal constitution and vocal capabilities in school-aged children are available. To take better care of children's voices, it might be helpful to know voice ranges and limits of not only vocally trained but also vocally untrained children. Goal of this study was the evaluation of singing voice capabilities of vocally healthy children with different social and vocal/musical backgrounds using voice range profile measurements (VRP). VRP percentiles that reflect constitutional aspects were suggested. In this cross-sectional study, 186 children (aged between seven and 10 years), attending five schools, were included. VRP measurements were performed under field conditions. Interviews and questionnaires regarding vocal strain and vocal training were applied; the answers were used for classification of singing activity and vocal training (KLASAK). All children reached a mean singing voice range of at least two octaves. By using the answers of interviews and questionnaires, the children could be classified according to vocal strain and vocal training. The groups showed no significant differences regarding VRP measurements. In the following step, percentiles were calculated. Twenty-five percent of all children (P25) reached a minimum voice range of almost two octaves, namely, 22 semitones (ST) from 220 to 784 Hz with soft and loud singing. Half of the children (P50) had a voice range of 24 ST (2 octaves), while soft singing and a larger voice range of 26 ST while loud singing. The measurements of third quartile (P75) revealed that 25% of children have even a larger voice range than 29 dB (from 196 Hz/g to 1047 Hz/c3) and can sing at most frequencies louder than 90 dB. P90 demonstrated that 10% of the children can sing even lower or higher than the frequency range between 196 Hz/g and 1319 Hz/e3 analyzed. The voice range seems not to be constrained by social but by voice/musical background: children of vocally/musically encouraged schools had wider voice ranges. This underlines the necessity of regular singing lessons already in primary schools. The percentile VRP introduced might help to evaluate the vocal constitution and vocal capabilities of a child.
目前仅有关于学龄儿童正常发声特点和发声能力的有限数据。为了更好地照顾儿童的嗓音,了解不仅受过声乐训练的儿童,而且未受过声乐训练的儿童的音域和音域限制可能会有所帮助。本研究的目的是使用嗓音范围剖面图(VRP)评估具有不同社会和嗓音/音乐背景的健康儿童的歌唱嗓音能力。提出了反映体质因素的 VRP 百分位数。在这项横断面研究中,纳入了 186 名(年龄在 7 至 10 岁之间)来自五所学校的儿童。在现场条件下进行 VRP 测量。进行了有关嗓音紧张和声乐训练的访谈和问卷调查;答案用于歌唱活动和声乐训练(KLASAK)的分类。所有儿童的平均歌唱音域至少达到两个八度。通过使用访谈和问卷调查的答案,可以根据嗓音紧张度和声乐训练对儿童进行分类。这些组在 VRP 测量方面没有显示出显著差异。在下一步中,计算了百分位数。所有儿童的 25%(P25)达到了近两个八度的最小声音范围,即从 220 到 784Hz 的柔和和响亮的歌声为 22 个半音(ST)。一半的儿童(P50)的音域为 24ST(两个八度),而柔和的歌声和更大的音域为 26ST,而响亮的歌声。第三个四分位数(P75)的测量结果表明,25%的儿童的音域甚至大于 29dB(从 196Hz/g 到 1047Hz/c3),并且可以以高于 90dB 的最大频率大声唱歌。P90 表明,10%的儿童甚至可以唱得比分析的 196Hz/g 和 1319Hz/e3 之间的频率范围更低或更高。音域似乎不受社会因素的限制,而是受嗓音/音乐背景的限制:受过嗓音/音乐鼓励的学校的儿童的音域更宽。这强调了在小学阶段就需要定期上歌唱课。引入的 VRP 百分位数可能有助于评估儿童的发声特点和发声能力。