Lovato Christine, Wagner Jon D
University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87110, USA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):827-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.093.
To determine whether or not an extended regimen of prophylactic antibiotics following either open or closed reduction of mandibular fractures is beneficial in lowering the rate of infection in postoperative patients.
This study is a retrospective chart review of 150 patients treated operatively for both complicated and uncomplicated mandibular fractures at University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center in Albuquerque, NM, between January 1, 2000 and June 12, 2007. Treatment modalities used were closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation or open reduction and internal fixation with either wire osteosynthesis or rigid internal fixation. Patients fell into 1 of 2 groups: the first group received antibiotics perioperatively, which consisted of no more than 24 hours of antibiotics in the postoperative period; the second group received extended regimen antibiotics, which consisted of anywhere from 24 hours to 10 days of antibiotics in the postoperative period. Seventy-five patients were included in each group. The type of antibiotic prescribed was at the discretion of the operating surgeon. This study was conducted using an intention-to-treat analysis. Postoperative infection was diagnosed either subjectively or objectively by the clinician evaluating the patient at follow-up appointments.
In the extended antibiotic group, 8 out of 75 subjects (10.67%) developed infection. In the perioperative antibiotic group, 10 out of 75 subjects (13.33%) developed infection. Statistical analysis using chi(2) distribution showed that this difference in proportions was not significant (chi(2) = 0.06, P = 0.8).
This study found that the use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics does not have a statistically significant effect on postoperative infection rates in surgical management of complicated or uncomplicated mandibular fractures.
确定下颌骨骨折切开复位或闭合复位后延长预防性抗生素使用方案是否有助于降低术后患者的感染率。
本研究是一项回顾性图表审查,研究对象为2000年1月1日至2007年6月12日期间在新墨西哥大学阿尔伯克基健康科学中心接受手术治疗的150例复杂和非复杂下颌骨骨折患者。所采用的治疗方式为颌间固定闭合复位或采用钢丝骨缝合术或坚固内固定术进行切开复位内固定。患者分为两组:第一组在围手术期接受抗生素治疗,术后抗生素使用时间不超过24小时;第二组接受延长方案抗生素治疗,术后抗生素使用时间为24小时至10天。每组纳入75例患者。所开抗生素的类型由主刀医生决定。本研究采用意向性分析。术后感染由在随访预约时评估患者的临床医生主观或客观诊断。
在延长抗生素治疗组中,75名受试者中有8名(10.67%)发生感染。在围手术期抗生素治疗组中,75名受试者中有10名(13.33%)发生感染。使用卡方分布进行的统计分析表明,这一比例差异不显著(卡方 = 0.06,P = 0.8)。
本研究发现,在复杂或非复杂下颌骨骨折的手术治疗中,术后预防性使用抗生素对术后感染率没有统计学上的显著影响。