Wilson Kumanan
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Healthc Policy. 2006 Nov;2(2):35-42.
The 2003 outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) exposed serious limitations in Canada's ability to respond to a public health emergency. Considerable progress has been made since SARS in addressing these limitations, including the creation of the new Public Health Agency of Canada. A remaining contentious question is whether there is a need for new federal emergency public health powers. Approaches to public health problems are best handled through collaborative processes, recognizing the critical importance of the local public health response. Nevertheless, this paper argues that a legislative back-up plan must be available to the federal government in the event that collaborative relationships break down. At the minimum, legislation should give the federal government the authority to have guaranteed access to surveillance data during a public health emergency. The legislation should also consider providing the federal government with the authority to devote the nation's resources to the management of an emergency at its earliest stages. However, any legislative approach must be combined with the development of appropriate capacity at the national level to ensure that new powers can be adequately utilized and that required funding reaches public health officials at other levels of government.
2003年严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)疫情暴露出加拿大应对突发公共卫生事件能力方面的严重缺陷。自SARS疫情以来,在解决这些缺陷方面已取得了相当大的进展,包括成立了新的加拿大公共卫生局。一个仍有争议的问题是,是否需要新的联邦紧急公共卫生权力。鉴于地方公共卫生应对措施的至关重要性,通过合作流程来处理公共卫生问题是最佳方式。尽管如此,本文认为,倘若合作关系破裂,联邦政府必须拥有一个立法备用方案。至少,立法应赋予联邦政府在突发公共卫生事件期间保证获取监测数据的权力。该立法还应考虑赋予联邦政府权力,使其能够在紧急情况的最早期阶段调配国家资源用于应急管理。然而,任何立法措施都必须与国家层面适当能力的发展相结合,以确保新权力能够得到充分利用,所需资金能够到达其他各级政府的公共卫生官员手中。