Research Center, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, 5400 Boulevard Gouin Ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Jul;47(7):719-29. doi: 10.1007/s11517-009-0472-x. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
The boundary-element method (BEM) is widely used for electrocardiogram (ECG) simulation. Its major disadvantage is its perceived inability to deal with the anisotropic electric conductivity of the myocardial interstitium, which led researchers to represent only intracellular anisotropy or neglect anisotropy altogether. We computed ECGs with a BEM model based on dipole sources that accounted for a "compound" anisotropy ratio. The ECGs were compared with those computed by a finite-difference model, in which intracellular and interstitial anisotropy could be represented without compromise. For a given set of conductivities, we always found a compound anisotropy value that led to acceptable differences between BEM and finite-difference results. In contrast, a fully isotropic model produced unacceptably large differences. A model that accounted only for intracellular anisotropy showed intermediate performance. We conclude that using a compound anisotropy ratio allows BEM-based ECG models to more accurately represent both anisotropies.
边界元法(BEM)广泛应用于心电图(ECG)模拟。它的主要缺点是被认为无法处理心肌间质的各向异性电导率,这导致研究人员仅表示细胞内各向异性或完全忽略各向异性。我们使用基于偶极子源的 BEM 模型计算了 ECG,该模型考虑了“复合”各向异性比。将 ECG 与不妥协地表示细胞内和细胞间各向异性的有限差分模型计算的 ECG 进行了比较。对于给定的电导率集,我们总是找到了一个复合各向异性值,使得 BEM 和有限差分结果之间的差异可以接受。相比之下,完全各向同性模型产生了不可接受的大差异。仅考虑细胞内各向异性的模型表现居中。我们得出结论,使用复合各向异性比可以使基于 BEM 的 ECG 模型更准确地表示两种各向异性。