Madureira Ana Flávia do Amaral
Institute of Psychology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2009 Jun;43(2):138-48. doi: 10.1007/s12124-009-9090-2.
The theoretical analysis by Watzlawik (Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 2009) demonstrates the scientific fragility of the constructs of masculinity and femininity based on the oversimplification and overlapping between three levels of analysis: group differences, inter-individual differences and intra-individual differences. Watzlawik presents fresh and relevant contributions in terms of methodological issues, especially about the construction of scientific generalizations. Here I focus on issues related to the transformation of stereotypes in statements about gender differences that claim to be 'scientific'--outlining the socio-political agendas of such statements.
瓦茨拉维克(《综合心理与行为科学》,2009年)的理论分析表明,基于群体差异、个体间差异和个体内差异这三个分析层面的过度简化和重叠,男性气质和女性气质的概念在科学上是脆弱的。瓦茨拉维克在方法论问题上,尤其是在科学概括的构建方面,提出了新颖且相关的见解。在此,我关注与那些声称“科学”的关于性别差异陈述中刻板印象转变相关的问题——概述此类陈述的社会政治议程。