• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种精神分裂症症状自评量表(4S):心理测量特性、信度和效度。

A symptom self-rating scale for schizophrenia (4S): psychometric properties, reliability and validity.

作者信息

Lindström Eva, Jedenius Erik, Levander Sten

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience-Psychiatry, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(5):368-74; suppl 1-4. doi: 10.1080/08039480902807298.

DOI:10.1080/08039480902807298
PMID:19306156
Abstract

The objective of the study was to validate a self-administrated symptom rating scale for use in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders by item analysis, exploration of factor structure, and analyses of reliability and validity. Data on 151 patients, initially treated by risperidone, obtained within the framework of a naturalistic Phase IV longitudinal study, were analysed by comparing patient and clinician ratings of symptoms, side-effects and global indices of illness. The Symptom Self-rating Scale for Schizophrenia (4S) is psychometrically adequate (item analysis, internal consistency, factor structure). Side-effect ratings were reliable. Symptom ratings displayed consistent associations with clinicians' ratings of corresponding symptom dimensions, suggesting construct validity. Patients had most difficulties assessing negative symptom items. Patients were well able to assess their own symptoms and drug side-effects. The factor structure of symptom ratings differs between patients and clinicians as well as how they construe global indices of illness. Clinicians focus on psychotic, patients on affective symptoms. Use of symptom self-ratings is one way to improve communication and thereby strengthen the therapeutic alliance and increase treatment adherence.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过项目分析、探索因子结构以及分析信度和效度,验证一种用于精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的自我管理症状评定量表。在一项自然主义的IV期纵向研究框架内,收集了151例最初接受利培酮治疗患者的数据,通过比较患者和临床医生对症状、副作用和疾病总体指标的评定进行分析。精神分裂症症状自评量表(4S)在心理测量学上是充分的(项目分析、内部一致性、因子结构)。副作用评定是可靠的。症状评定与临床医生对相应症状维度的评定显示出一致的关联,表明具有结构效度。患者在评估阴性症状项目时最困难。患者能够很好地评估自己的症状和药物副作用。患者和临床医生之间症状评定的因子结构不同,他们对疾病总体指标的理解方式也不同。临床医生关注精神病性症状,患者关注情感症状。使用症状自评是改善沟通的一种方式,从而加强治疗联盟并提高治疗依从性。

相似文献

1
A symptom self-rating scale for schizophrenia (4S): psychometric properties, reliability and validity.一种精神分裂症症状自评量表(4S):心理测量特性、信度和效度。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(5):368-74; suppl 1-4. doi: 10.1080/08039480902807298.
2
Concordance of patient and clinical ratings of symptom severity and change of psychotic illness.患者对症状严重程度的评定与临床评定以及精神病性疾病变化的一致性。
Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):359-60. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.10.021. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales.精神症状评定量表的心理计量学评估。
Compr Psychiatry. 2011 Jan-Feb;52(1):102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
4
Reliability and validity of the Medication Adherence Rating Scale in a cohort of patients with schizophrenia from Nigeria.尼日利亚精神分裂症患者队列中药物依从性评定量表的信度和效度
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2018 Apr-Jun;40(2):85-92. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0077. Epub 2018 May 14.
5
Construct validity of 2 measures to assess reasons for antipsychotic discontinuation and continuation from patients' and clinicians' perspectives in a clinical trial.评估精神分裂症患者停药和继续用药原因的 2 种测量工具的结构效度:来自临床试验中患者和临床医生的视角。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Sep 13;12:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-142.
6
Evaluation of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.评价精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍的疾病管理和康复量表。
Schizophr Res. 2011 Nov;132(2-3):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
7
The Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) validated against electronic monitoring in assessing the antipsychotic medication adherence of outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.在评估精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍门诊患者抗精神病药物依从性方面,经电子监测验证的简易依从性评定量表(BARS)。
Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.12.470. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
8
Validation study of the Medication Adherence Rating Scale. Results from the FACE-SZ national dataset.药物依从性评定量表的验证研究。来自FACE-SZ国家数据集的结果。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Apr;182:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
9
Efficacy of risperidone versus olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia previously on chronic conventional antipsychotic therapy: a switch study.利培酮与奥氮平对曾接受慢性传统抗精神病药物治疗的精神分裂症患者的疗效比较:一项换药研究
J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Oct;40(7):669-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.03.008. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
10
[Rationale for the use of long-acting injectable risperidone: a survey of French psychiatrists].[使用长效注射用利培酮的基本原理:法国精神科医生的一项调查]
Encephale. 2013 May;39 Suppl 1:S8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.03.005. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Attentional biases, as measured by motion-induced blindness, are linked to schizophrenia traits.通过运动诱导失明测量的注意力偏差与精神分裂症特征有关。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0325609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325609. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychological predictors of functional outcome in people with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者功能结局的心理预测因素。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Aug;157(1-3):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.04.030. Epub 2014 May 27.
3
Genome-wide association study of patient-rated and clinician-rated global impression of severity during antipsychotic treatment.
抗精神病药物治疗期间患者自评和临床医生评定的严重程度的全基因组关联研究。
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2013 Feb;23(2):69-77. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32835ca260.