• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童性虐待案件审判中的陪审团遴选:案例分析

Jury selection in child sex abuse trials: a case analysis.

作者信息

Cramer Robert J, Adams Desiree D, Brodsky Stanley L

机构信息

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

J Child Sex Abus. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):190-205. doi: 10.1080/10538710902743974.

DOI:10.1080/10538710902743974
PMID:19306206
Abstract

Child sex abuse cases have been the target of considerable psycho-legal research. The present paper offers an analysis of psychological constructs for jury selection in child sex abuse cases from the defense perspective. The authors specifically delineate general and case-specific jury selection variables. General variables include authoritarianism, dogmatism, need for cognition, pretrial knowledge, and race/socioeconomic status. Case-specific variables include sexual attitudes, homonegativity, juror abuse history, and beliefs about children. The paper also provides a factual background of a representative case, incorporates relevant case law, identifies sources for voir dire and juror questionnaire items, and discusses lessons from the primary author's first experience as a trial consultant for the defense.

摘要

儿童性虐待案件一直是大量心理法学研究的对象。本文从辩方角度对儿童性虐待案件中陪审团挑选的心理建构进行了分析。作者具体阐述了一般和特定案件的陪审团挑选变量。一般变量包括权威主义、教条主义、认知需求、审前知识以及种族/社会经济地位。特定案件变量包括性态度、对同性恋的消极态度、陪审员的虐待史以及对儿童的看法。本文还提供了一个代表性案件的事实背景,纳入了相关判例法,确定了询问陪审团成员和陪审员调查问卷项目的来源,并讨论了第一作者作为辩方审判顾问的首次经历所带来的经验教训。

相似文献

1
Jury selection in child sex abuse trials: a case analysis.儿童性虐待案件审判中的陪审团遴选:案例分析
J Child Sex Abus. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):190-205. doi: 10.1080/10538710902743974.
2
Juror and expert knowledge of child sexual abuse.陪审员及对儿童性虐待的专业知识。
Child Abuse Negl. 1992 Jul-Aug;16(4):595-613. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(92)90075-3.
3
Psychiatric aspects of sexual abuse.性虐待的精神科问题。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1986;14(4):331-43.
4
Child sexual abuse and forensic psychiatry: evolving and controversial issues.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1992;20(4):439-53.
5
Sexual abuse allegations by children with neuropsychiatric disorders.患有神经精神疾病儿童的性虐待指控。
J Child Sex Abus. 2011 Mar;20(2):182-95. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2011.554339.
6
(Mis)understanding Cleveland: foundational issues and the sexual abuse of children.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1989 Oct;3(4):347-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1989.tb00522.x.
7
False memory syndrome: undermining the credibility of complainants in sexual offences.虚假记忆综合征:损害性犯罪中投诉人的可信度。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2003 Sep-Oct;26(5):453-71. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2527(03)00081-5.
8
Child sexual abuse suspicions: treatment considerations during investigation.儿童性虐待怀疑:调查期间的治疗考量
J Child Sex Abus. 2010 Sep;19(5):554-71. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2010.512554.
9
Child witnesses.
Med Sci Law. 1996 Oct;36(4):277-82. doi: 10.1177/002580249603600401.
10
Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.专家证词会影响涉及童年性虐待恢复记忆的刑事审判中陪审员的决定。
J Child Sex Abus. 2013;22(8):949-67. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2013.839592.