Suppr超能文献

解释性报告与危急值。

Interpretative reports and critical values.

作者信息

Piva Elisa, Plebani Mario

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2009 Jun;404(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.028. Epub 2009 Mar 21.

Abstract

In the clinical laboratory to allow an effective testing process, post-analytical activity can have two goals in trying to improve patient safety: result interpretation and communication of critical values. Both are important issues, and their success requires a cooperative effort. Misinterpretation of laboratory test results or ineffectiveness in their notification can lead to diagnostic errors or errors in identifying patient critical conditions. With the awareness that the incorrect interpretation of tests and the breakdown in the communication of critical values are preventable errors, laboratorians should make every effort to prevent the types of errors that potentially harm patients. In order to improve the reliability of laboratories, we attempt to explain how interpretative reporting and automated notification of critical values can be used to reduce errors. Clinical laboratories can therefore work to improve clinical effectiveness, without forgetting that everything should be designed to provide the best outcomes for patients.

摘要

在临床实验室中,为了确保有效的检测过程,分析后活动在致力于提高患者安全方面可以有两个目标:结果解读和危急值报告。这两者都是重要问题,且它们的成功需要协同努力。实验室检测结果的错误解读或报告不力可能导致诊断错误或在识别患者危急状况时出现差错。鉴于认识到检测结果的错误解读和危急值报告失误是可预防的错误,检验人员应竭尽全力防止可能对患者造成伤害的各类错误。为提高实验室的可靠性,我们试图解释如何利用解读性报告和危急值自动报告来减少错误。因此,临床实验室可以努力提高临床效能,同时不要忘记一切设计都应以给患者带来最佳结果为目的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验