Agarwal Rachna, Chhillar Neelam, Tripathi Chandra B
Department of Neurochemistry, Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi, 110095 India.
Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi, 110095 India.
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2015 Jan;30(1):89-93. doi: 10.1007/s12291-013-0409-x. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
During post-analytical phase, critical value notification to responsible caregiver in a timely manner has potential to improve patient safety which requires cooperative efforts between laboratory personnel and caregivers. It is widely accepted by hospital accreditors that ineffective notification can lead to diagnostic errors that potentially harm patients and are preventable. The objective of the study was to assess the variables affecting critical value notification, their role in affecting it's quality and approaches to improve it. In the present study 1,187 critical values were analysed in the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory catering to tertiary care hospital for neuropsychiatric diseases. During 25 months of study period, we evaluated critical value notification with respect to clinical care area, caregiver to whom it was notified and timeliness of notification. During the study period (25 months), the laboratory obtained 1,279 critical values in clinical chemistry. The analytes most commonly notified were sodium and potassium (20.97 & 20.8 % of total critical results). Analysis of critical value notification versus area of care showed that critical value notification was high in ICU and emergency area followed by inpatients and 64.61 % critical values were notified between 30 and 120 min after receiving the samples. It was found that failure to notify the responsible caregiver in timely manner represent an important patient safety issue and may lead to diagnostic errors. The major area of concern are notification of critical value for outpatient samples, incompleteness of test requisition forms regarding illegible writing, lack of information of treating physician and location of test ordering and difficulty in contacting the responsible caregiver.
在分析后阶段,及时向负责的护理人员通报危急值有可能提高患者安全,这需要实验室人员和护理人员的共同努力。医院评审机构普遍认为,无效通报可能导致诊断错误,这些错误可能会对患者造成伤害且是可预防的。本研究的目的是评估影响危急值通报的变量、它们在影响通报质量方面的作用以及改进通报的方法。在本研究中,对一家神经精神疾病三级护理医院的临床化学实验室的1187个危急值进行了分析。在25个月的研究期间,我们评估了危急值通报在临床护理区域、接收通报的护理人员以及通报及时性方面的情况。在研究期间(25个月),该实验室在临床化学方面获得了1279个危急值。最常通报的分析物是钠和钾(分别占总危急结果的20.97%和20.8%)。对危急值通报与护理区域的分析表明,重症监护病房(ICU)和急诊区域的危急值通报率较高,其次是住院患者,64.61%的危急值在收到样本后30至120分钟内得到通报。研究发现,未能及时通知负责的护理人员是一个重要的患者安全问题,可能导致诊断错误。主要关注的领域包括门诊样本危急值的通报、检验申请单因字迹模糊而不完整、缺乏主治医生信息和检验订单位置以及难以联系到负责的护理人员。