• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知加法:年轻人和老年人在策略选择与信息处理速度上的差异

Cognitive addition: strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in young and elderly adults.

作者信息

Geary D C, Wiley J G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 1991 Sep;6(3):474-83. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.6.3.474.

DOI:10.1037//0882-7974.6.3.474
PMID:1930764
Abstract

Sixty young and 60 elderly adults completed a pencil-and-paper addition test and solved 40 computer-presented simple addition problems. Strategies and problem solution times were recorded on a trial-by-trial basis and were classified in accordance with the distributions of associations model of strategy choices. The elderly group showed a performance advantage on the ability measure and for the developmental maturity of the mix of problem-solving strategies, but the young group showed an advantage for overall solution times. A componential analysis of the overall solution times for memory retrieval trials, however, showed no reliable age difference for rate of retrieving addition facts from long-term memory but did suggest that the elderly adults might have been slower than the younger adults for rate of encoding digits and verbally producing an answer. Overall results are interpreted within the context of the strategy choice model.

摘要

60名年轻人和60名老年人完成了一项纸笔加法测试,并解答了40道计算机呈现的简单加法问题。在每次试验的基础上记录策略和问题解决时间,并根据策略选择的联想分布模型进行分类。老年组在能力测量和解决问题策略组合的发展成熟度方面表现出优势,但年轻组在总体解决时间上表现出优势。然而,对记忆检索试验的总体解决时间进行的成分分析表明,从长期记忆中检索加法事实的速度没有可靠的年龄差异,但确实表明老年人在数字编码和口头给出答案的速度上可能比年轻人慢。总体结果在策略选择模型的背景下进行了解释。

相似文献

1
Cognitive addition: strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in young and elderly adults.认知加法:年轻人和老年人在策略选择与信息处理速度上的差异
Psychol Aging. 1991 Sep;6(3):474-83. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.6.3.474.
2
Simple and complex mental subtraction: strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in younger and older adults.简单与复杂的心算减法:年轻人和老年人在策略选择及信息处理速度上的差异
Psychol Aging. 1993 Jun;8(2):242-56. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.8.2.242.
3
Cognitive skill learning: age-related differences in strategy shifts and speed of component operations.认知技能学习:策略转换及组成操作速度方面与年龄相关的差异。
Psychol Aging. 2004 Dec;19(4):565-80. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.565.
4
Young and older adults' strategies in complex arithmetic.年轻人和年长者在复杂算术运算中的策略
Am J Psychol. 2008 Spring;121(1):1-16.
5
On mental multiplication and age.论心算与年龄
Psychol Aging. 1992 Dec;7(4):536-45. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.7.4.536.
6
The use of the operand-recognition paradigm for the study of mental addition in older adults.运用操作数识别范式研究老年人的心理加法。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):64-7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs040. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
7
Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method.老年人与年轻人在乘法运算中的策略选择:运用选择/无选择法检验自适应策略选择模型的预测
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Mar;126(1):71-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.126.1.71.
8
A componential analysis of an early learning deficit in mathematics.对早期数学学习缺陷的成分分析。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1990 Jun;49(3):363-83. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90065-g.
9
Proportional slowing and addition speed in old and young adults.
Psychol Aging. 1994 Mar;9(1):72-80. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.9.1.72.
10
Age differences in dual-task performance after practice.练习后双重任务表现的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2007 Sep;22(3):596-606. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.596.

引用本文的文献

1
Dialect and mathematics performance in African American children who use AAE: Insights from explanatory IRT and error analysis.使用非裔美国英语的非裔美国儿童的方言与数学成绩:来自解释性项目反应理论和错误分析的见解。
Educ Assess. 2024;29(3):147-162. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2024.2370787. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Individual Differences in Addition Strategy Choice: A Psychometric Evaluation.加法策略选择中的个体差异:一项心理测量学评估。
J Educ Psychol. 2019 Apr;111(3):414-433. doi: 10.1037/edu0000294. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
3
What Do Arithmetic Errors in the Financial Context Reveal? A Preliminary Study of Individuals with Neurocognitive Disorders.
金融背景下的算术错误揭示了什么?对神经认知障碍个体的初步研究。
Neurol Int. 2023 Jun 1;15(2):743-749. doi: 10.3390/neurolint15020046.
4
Ancient visual channels have a causal role in arithmetic calculations.远古视觉通道在算术计算中起因果作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 23;11(1):22795. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02260-9.
5
Developmental fronto-parietal shift of brain activation during mental arithmetic across the lifespan: A registered report protocol.发展性额顶叶脑区激活在整个生命周期内的心算任务中的转变:一份注册报告方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0256232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256232. eCollection 2021.
6
Emerging neurodevelopmental perspectives on mathematical learning.关于数学学习的新兴神经发育观点。
Dev Rev. 2021 Jun;60. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2021.100964. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Arithmetic processing in children with dyscalculia: an event-related potential study.计算障碍儿童的算术处理:一项事件相关电位研究。
PeerJ. 2021 Jan 27;9:e10489. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10489. eCollection 2021.
8
Storage and processing in working memory: Assessing dual-task performance and task prioritization across the adult lifespan.工作记忆的存储和处理:评估成年期的双重任务表现和任务优先级。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jul;148(7):1204-1227. doi: 10.1037/xge0000539. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
9
Materials count: Linear-spatial materials improve young children's addition strategies and accuracy, irregular arrays don't.材料数量:线性空间材料可提高幼儿的加法策略和准确性,不规则数组则不行。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0208832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208832. eCollection 2018.
10
Dual-task costs in working memory: An adversarial collaboration.工作记忆中的双重任务成本:一种对抗性合作。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Sep;45(9):1529-1551. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000668. Epub 2018 Nov 8.