El-Sayed Ahmed Mounir Moustafa
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Menoufiya, Menoufiya, Egypt ,
J Child Orthop. 2008 Jun;2(3):229-37. doi: 10.1007/s11832-008-0094-0. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
The goal of this study was to compare results of open arthrotomy versus arthroscopic drainage in treating septic arthritis of the hip in children.
This prospective controlled study was conducted on twenty patients (20 hips) with acute septic arthritis of the hip. Diagnosis was suspected if there was: a history of fever, non-weight-bearing on the affected limb, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of at least 40 mm/h, and white blood cell count of more than 12,000 cells per cubic millimeter. Diagnosis was established by ultrasonographic examination of the affected hip followed by ultrasound-guided aspiration of the joint. Patients were allocated to have either open arthrotomy or arthroscopic drainage of the joint. There were ten patients (ten hips) in each treatment group. The mean age of the patients was 7.3 years in the arthrotomy group, and 8 years in the arthroscopy group. The mean temperatures for the arthrotomy and arthroscopy groups were 38.8 and 38.7 degrees C, respectively. All the children were unable to bear weight on the affected limb.
Staphylococcus aureus was the most common causative microorganism in both groups. The mean duration of the children's hospital stay was 6.4 days in the arthrotomy group and 3.8 days in the arthroscopy group. The difference was highly significant. Infection could be eradicated in all patients of both groups. At the latest follow-up, seven children in the arthrotomy group (70%) had excellent results and three children (30%) had good results. In the arthroscopy group, nine children (90%) had excellent results and one child (10%) had good results. The difference was not statistically significant.
Arthroscopic drainage is an effective method in treating septic arthritis of the hip. It is a minimal invasive procedure which is associated with less hospital stay. Arthroscopic drainage of septic arthritis of the hip in children is a valid alternative procedure in early uncomplicated cases and for orthopedic surgeons skilled in pediatric arthroscopy.
本研究的目的是比较切开手术与关节镜下引流治疗儿童髋关节化脓性关节炎的效果。
对20例(20髋)急性髋关节化脓性关节炎患儿进行了这项前瞻性对照研究。如果存在以下情况,则怀疑诊断:发热史、患侧肢体不能负重、红细胞沉降率(ESR)至少40mm/h以及白细胞计数超过每立方毫米12,000个细胞。通过对患侧髋关节进行超声检查,随后在超声引导下对关节进行穿刺抽吸来确诊。患者被分配接受切开手术或关节镜下关节引流。每个治疗组有10例患者(10髋)。切开手术组患者的平均年龄为7.3岁,关节镜检查组患者的平均年龄为8岁。切开手术组和关节镜检查组的平均体温分别为38.8摄氏度和38.7摄氏度。所有儿童患侧肢体均不能负重。
金黄色葡萄球菌是两组中最常见的致病微生物。切开手术组患儿的平均住院时间为6.4天,关节镜检查组为3.8天。差异非常显著。两组所有患者的感染均得以根除。在最近一次随访时,切开手术组7名儿童(70%)效果极佳,3名儿童(30%)效果良好。关节镜检查组9名儿童(90%)效果极佳,1名儿童(10%)效果良好。差异无统计学意义。
关节镜下引流是治疗髋关节化脓性关节炎的有效方法。它是一种微创手术,住院时间较短。对于早期无并发症的病例以及熟练掌握小儿关节镜技术的骨科医生来说,儿童髋关节化脓性关节炎的关节镜下引流是一种有效的替代手术方法。