Davidson B R, Babich J, Young H, Waddington W, Clarke G, Short M, Boulos P, Styles J, Dean C
Department of Surgery, University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Br J Cancer. 1991 Nov;64(5):850-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.412.
This study has investigated two of the main problems with radiolabelled antibody imaging, the formation of circulating immune complexes (I.C.) and the non specific binding of radiolabel to the antibody molecule. Patients undergoing immunoscintigraphy with 111In labelled monoclonal antibody ICR2 were divided into three groups who received either the radiolabelled antibody alone (control, n = 12), the radiolabelled antibody which was incubated with the chelating agent diethylene triamine pentacetic acid (DTPA) prior to size exclusion chromatography (n = 6) or whose injectate was treated with DTPA and cold MAb administered intravenously prior to radiolabelled MAb administration (n = 6). Radiolabelled antibody uptake in abdominal organs was measured by region of interest analysis using a gamma camera with online computer and that in tumour and normal tissues by gamma well counting of biopsies. Circulating antigen and immune complex was measured by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). The sensitivity of tumour imaging and the tumour uptake of radiolabelled antibody was not significantly different between the groups. Patients with high circulating antigen levels developed high levels of circulating immune complex but also had high tumour uptakes of radiolabelled antibody. Administration of cold MAb increased the splenic, but did not effect the tumour uptake of radiolabelled antibody and only minimally reduced levels of circulating immune complex. Chelate administration reduced the urinary excretion of radioactivity but increased the liver uptake of radioactivity. These results have shown that successful antibody imaging can be carried out despite high levels of circulating antigen, that large doses of unlabelled antibody are required to prevent immune complex formation and that removal of non specifically bound 111In does not reduce the liver uptake of radioactivity.
本研究调查了放射性标记抗体成像的两个主要问题,即循环免疫复合物(I.C.)的形成以及放射性标记物与抗体分子的非特异性结合。接受用铟-111标记的单克隆抗体ICR2进行免疫闪烁显像的患者被分为三组,分别单独接受放射性标记抗体(对照组,n = 12)、在尺寸排阻色谱之前与螯合剂二乙烯三胺五乙酸(DTPA)孵育的放射性标记抗体(n = 6),或其注射剂在给予放射性标记单克隆抗体之前先用DTPA和冷单克隆抗体静脉注射处理的患者(n = 6)。使用带在线计算机的γ相机通过感兴趣区分析测量腹部器官中放射性标记抗体的摄取,通过活检组织的γ计数测量肿瘤和正常组织中的摄取。通过高压液相色谱(HPLC)测量循环抗原和免疫复合物。各组之间肿瘤成像的敏感性和放射性标记抗体的肿瘤摄取没有显著差异。循环抗原水平高的患者循环免疫复合物水平也高,但放射性标记抗体的肿瘤摄取也高。给予冷单克隆抗体增加了脾脏对放射性标记抗体的摄取,但不影响肿瘤摄取,且仅略微降低了循环免疫复合物的水平。螯合剂给药减少了放射性的尿液排泄,但增加了肝脏对放射性的摄取。这些结果表明,尽管循环抗原水平高,仍可成功进行抗体成像,需要大剂量未标记抗体来防止免疫复合物形成,并且去除非特异性结合的铟-111不会降低肝脏对放射性的摄取。