Suppr超能文献

患者对结肠镜检查的满意度:文献综述与初步研究

Patient satisfaction with colonoscopy: a literature review and pilot study.

作者信息

Chartier L, Arthurs E, Sewitch M J

机构信息

Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;23(3):203-9. doi: 10.1155/2009/903545.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend that colonoscopic colorectal cancer screening be undertaken every 10 years after the age of 50 years. However, because the procedure does not meet criteria that promote screening uptake, patient satisfaction with colonoscopy may encourage repeat screening.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature and conduct a pilot study of patient satisfaction with the colonoscopy experience.

METHODS

All cohort studies from January 1997 to August 2008 in the MEDLINE database that measured either patient satisfaction with colonoscopy, patient willingness to return for colonoscopy under the same conditions or patient preference for colonoscopy compared with other large bowel procedures were identified. The search was supplemented by journal citation lists in the retrieved articles.

RESULTS

Of the 29 studies identified, 15 met the inclusion criteria. Consistently, the vast majority of patients (approximately 95%) were very satisfied with their colonoscopy experience. Patient satisfaction was similar for screening and nonscreening colonoscopy. Patient willingness to return for the procedure ranged from 73% to 100%. Of the five studies that examined modality preference, three studies reported the majority of patients preferred colonography to colonoscopy and two studies reported the reverse. Our pilot study findings mirrored those of other studies that were conducted in the United States. The major limitation of the included studies was that patients who were most dissatisfied may have gone elsewhere to have their colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were very satisfied with colonoscopy. The majority were willing to return for repeat testing under the same conditions, and colonoscopy was not preferred over other modalities. However, studies were limited by methodological shortcomings.

摘要

背景

当前指南建议50岁以后每10年进行一次结肠镜结直肠癌筛查。然而,由于该检查不符合促进筛查接受度的标准,患者对结肠镜检查的满意度可能会促使其进行重复筛查。

目的

系统回顾文献并开展一项关于患者对结肠镜检查体验满意度的试点研究。

方法

检索MEDLINE数据库中1997年1月至2008年8月期间所有测量患者对结肠镜检查的满意度、在相同条件下患者愿意再次接受结肠镜检查的意愿或与其他大肠检查相比患者对结肠镜检查的偏好的队列研究。通过检索文章中的期刊引用列表对搜索进行补充。

结果

在识别出的29项研究中,15项符合纳入标准。一致的是,绝大多数患者(约95%)对结肠镜检查体验非常满意。筛查性和非筛查性结肠镜检查的患者满意度相似。患者愿意再次接受该检查的比例在73%至100%之间。在五项检查方式偏好的研究中,三项研究报告称大多数患者更喜欢结肠造影而非结肠镜检查,两项研究报告结果相反。我们的试点研究结果与在美国进行的其他研究结果相似。纳入研究的主要局限性在于,最不满意的患者可能去其他地方进行结肠镜检查了。

结论

患者对结肠镜检查非常满意。大多数患者愿意在相同条件下再次接受检查,且结肠镜检查并非比其他方式更受青睐。然而,研究受到方法学缺陷的限制。

相似文献

1
Patient satisfaction with colonoscopy: a literature review and pilot study.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;23(3):203-9. doi: 10.1155/2009/903545.
3
CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study.
Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):328-37. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2331031208. Epub 2004 Sep 9.
6
7
Patient tolerance and acceptance of different colonic imaging modalities: an observational cohort study.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;30(5):520-525. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001090.
8
Patient experiences of colonoscopy, barium enema and CT colonography: a qualitative study.
Br J Radiol. 2009 Jan;82(973):13-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr/61732956. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
9
Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests.
Am J Med. 2006 Sep;119(9):791-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.02.013.
10

引用本文的文献

4
The effectiveness of FOBT vs. FIT: A meta-analysis on colorectal cancer screening test.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 May 9;30:366. eCollection 2016.
5
Long-term patient satisfaction of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.
Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;29(2):188-95. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0011.
8
Dynamic position change at colonoscopy improves adenoma detection.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;27(9):508. doi: 10.1155/2013/575412.
9
Comparison of double pants with single pants on satisfaction with colonoscopy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 14;19(26):4177-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4177.
10
Face-to-face vs telephone pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer screening; a randomised trial.
Br J Cancer. 2012 Sep 25;107(7):1051-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.358. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Colonoscopy is the preferred colorectal cancer screening method in a population-based program.
Endoscopy. 2008 Aug;40(8):650-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077350. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
4
CT colonography: current status and future promise.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008 Mar;37(1):161-89, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2007.12.016.
7
CT colonography in cancer detection: methods and results.
Cancer Imaging. 2004 Apr 6;4 Spec No A(Spec No A):S33-41. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2004.0014.
8
Pertinence of a pre-colonoscopy consultation for routine information delivery.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2007 Dec;31(12):1055-61. doi: 10.1016/s0399-8320(07)78334-3.
9
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines in Canada.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct 2;7:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-7-39.
10
Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey.
Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):415-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00196.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验