Jasinska A J, Service S, Jawaheer D, DeYoung J, Levinson M, Zhang Z, Kremeyer B, Muller H, Aldana I, Garcia J, Restrepo G, Lopez C, Palacio C, Duque C, Parra M, Vega J, Ortiz D, Bedoya G, Mathews C, Davanzo P, Fournier E, Bejarano J, Ramirez M, Araya Ortiz C, Araya X, Molina J, Sabatti C, Reus V, Ospina J, Macaya G, Ruiz-Linares A, Freimer N B
Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009 Oct 5;150B(7):998-1006. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30956.
We previously reported linkage of bipolar disorder to 5q33-q34 in families from two closely related population isolates, the Central Valley of Costa Rica (CVCR) and Antioquia, Colombia (CO). Here we present follow up results from fine-scale mapping in large CVCR and CO families segregating severe bipolar disorder, BP-I, and in 343 population trios/duos from CVCR and CO. Employing densely spaced SNPs to fine map the prior linkage peak region increases linkage evidence and clarifies the position of the putative BP-I locus. We performed two-point linkage analysis with 1134 SNPs in an approximately 9 Mb region between markers D5S410 and D5S422. Combining pedigrees from CVCR and CO yields a LOD score of 4.9 at SNP rs10035961. Two other SNPs (rs7721142 and rs1422795) within the same 94 kb region also displayed LOD scores greater than 4. This linkage peak coincides with our prior microsatellite results and suggests a narrowed BP-I susceptibility regions in these families. To investigate if the locus implicated in the familial form of BP-I also contributes to disease risk in the population, we followed up the family results with association analysis in duo and trio samples, obtaining signals within 2 Mb of the peak linkage signal in the pedigrees; rs12523547 and rs267015 (P = 0.00004 and 0.00016, respectively) in the CO sample and rs244960 in the CVCR sample and the combined sample, with P = 0.00032 and 0.00016, respectively. It remains unclear whether these association results reflect the same locus contributing to BP susceptibility within the extended pedigrees.
我们之前报道过,在来自两个密切相关的人群隔离群体(哥斯达黎加中央山谷(CVCR)和哥伦比亚安蒂奥基亚(CO))的家族中,双相情感障碍与5q33 - q34存在连锁关系。在此,我们展示了对CVCR和CO的大型家族中严重双相情感障碍(BP-I型)进行精细定位的后续结果,以及来自CVCR和CO的343个群体三联体/二联体的结果。利用紧密间隔的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)对先前的连锁峰值区域进行精细定位,增加了连锁证据,并明确了假定的BP-I基因座的位置。我们在标记D5S410和D5S422之间大约9兆碱基(Mb)的区域内,用1134个SNP进行了两点连锁分析。合并来自CVCR和CO的家系,在SNP rs10035961处得到的对数优势(LOD)分数为4.9。在同一94千碱基(kb)区域内的另外两个SNP(rs7721142和rs1422795)的LOD分数也大于4。这个连锁峰值与我们之前的微卫星结果一致,并表明在这些家族中BP-I易感性区域变窄了。为了研究与家族性BP-I型相关的基因座是否也对人群中的疾病风险有影响,我们在二联体和三联体样本中通过关联分析对家族结果进行了跟进,在系谱中峰值连锁信号的2兆碱基范围内获得了信号;在CO样本中有rs12523547和rs267015(P值分别为0.00004和0.00016),在CVCR样本以及合并样本中有rs244960,P值分别为0.00032和0.00016。目前尚不清楚这些关联结果是否反映了在扩展家系中对BP易感性有影响的同一个基因座。