Suppr超能文献

米非司酮(RU486)与孕酮对孕酮受体结合机制的差异。

Differences in the binding mechanism of RU486 and progesterone to the progesterone receptor.

作者信息

Skafar D F

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201.

出版信息

Biochemistry. 1991 Nov 12;30(45):10829-32. doi: 10.1021/bi00109a003.

Abstract

The binding mechanism of the antagonist RU486 to the progesterone receptor was compared with that of the agonists progesterone and R5020. Both progesterone and RU486 bound to the receptor with a Hill coefficient of 1.2, indicating the binding of each ligand is positive cooperative. However, when each ligand was used to compete with [3H]progesterone for binding to the receptor at receptor concentrations near 8 nM, at which the receptor is likely a dimer, the competition curve for RU486 was significantly steeper than the curves for progesterone and R5020 (p less than 0.001). This indicated that a difference in the binding mechanism of RU486 and progesterone can be detected when both ligands are present. In contrast, at receptor concentrations near 1 nM, at which the receptor is likely a monomer, the competition curves for all three ligands were indistinguishable (p = 0.915). These results indicate that RU486 and agonists have different binding mechanisms for the receptor and further suggest that this difference may be related to site-site interactions within the receptor.

摘要

将拮抗剂RU486与激动剂孕酮和R5020与孕酮受体的结合机制进行了比较。孕酮和RU486均以1.2的希尔系数与受体结合,表明每个配体的结合是正协同的。然而,当在受体浓度接近8 nM(此时受体可能为二聚体)时,使用每种配体与[3H]孕酮竞争结合受体时,RU486的竞争曲线比孕酮和R5020的曲线明显更陡(p小于0.001)。这表明当两种配体都存在时,可以检测到RU486和孕酮结合机制的差异。相比之下,在受体浓度接近1 nM(此时受体可能为单体)时,所有三种配体的竞争曲线无法区分(p = 0.915)。这些结果表明,RU486和激动剂对受体具有不同的结合机制,并进一步表明这种差异可能与受体内的位点间相互作用有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验