Suppr超能文献

使用含酒精洗手液进行外科洗手消毒:1.5分钟和3分钟涂抹后的效果比较

Surgical hand antisepsis with alcohol-based hand rub: comparison of effectiveness after 1.5 and 3 minutes of application.

作者信息

Weber Walter P, Reck Stefan, Neff Uschi, Saccilotto Ramon, Dangel Marc, Rotter Manfred L, Frei Reno, Oertli Daniel, Marti Walter R, Widmer Andreas F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 May;30(5):420-6. doi: 10.1086/596772.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Research has shown 1.5 minutes of surgical hand antisepsis with alcohol-based hand rub to be at least as effective under experimental conditions as the 3-minute reference disinfection recommended by European Norm 12791. The aim of the present study was to validate the effectiveness of 1.5 minutes of surgical hand antisepsis in a clinical setting by comparing the effectiveness of 1.5- and 3-minute applications of alcohol-based hand rub (45% vol/vol 2-propanol, 30% vol/vol 1-propanol, and 0.2% mecetronium ethylsulphate).

DESIGN

Prospective crossover trial in which each surgeon served as his or her own control, with individual randomization to the 1.5- or the 3-minute group during the first part of the trial.

SETTING

Basel University Hospital, Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-two surgeons with different levels of postdoctoral training.

METHODS

We measured the bactericidal effectiveness of 1.5 minutes and 3 minutes of surgical hand antisepsis with alcohol-based hand rub by assessing the mean (+/-SD) log10 number of colony-forming units before the application of hand rub (baseline), after the application of hand rub (immediate effect), and after surgery (sustained effect) so as to follow European Norm 12791 as closely as possible.

RESULTS

The immediate mean (+/-SD) log10 reduction in colony-forming units (cfu) was 2.26 +/- 1.13 log10 cfu for the 1.5-minute group and 3.01 +/- 1.06 log10 cfu for the 3-minute group (P = .204). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to the sustained effect; the mean (+/-SD) log10 increase in bacterial density during surgery was 1.08 +/- 1.13 log10 cfu for the 1.5-minute group and 0.95 +/- 1.27 log10 cfu for the 3-minute group (P = .708). No adverse effects were recorded.

CONCLUSION

In this clinical trial, surgical hand antisepsis with alcohol-based hand rub resulted in a similar bacterial reduction, regardless of whether it was applied for 3 or 1.5 minutes, which confirms experimental data generated with healthy volunteers.

摘要

目的

研究表明,在实验条件下,使用含酒精洗手液进行1.5分钟的外科手消毒至少与欧洲标准12791推荐的3分钟参考消毒效果相同。本研究的目的是通过比较使用含酒精洗手液(体积分数为45%的2-丙醇、体积分数为30%的1-丙醇和0.2%的乙硫酸美西铵)1.5分钟和3分钟的消毒效果,在临床环境中验证1.5分钟外科手消毒的有效性。

设计

前瞻性交叉试验,每位外科医生作为自己的对照,在试验的第一部分进行个体随机分组,分为1.5分钟组或3分钟组。

地点

瑞士巴塞尔大学医院。

参与者

32名具有不同博士后培训水平的外科医生。

方法

我们通过评估使用洗手液前(基线)、使用洗手液后(即时效果)和手术后(持续效果)的平均(±标准差)菌落形成单位的对数10值,来测量使用含酒精洗手液进行1.5分钟和3分钟外科手消毒的杀菌效果,以便尽可能严格遵循欧洲标准12791。

结果

1.5分钟组菌落形成单位(cfu)的即时平均(±标准差)对数10减少量为2.26±1.13 log10 cfu,3分钟组为3.01±1.06 log10 cfu(P = 0.204)。同样,两组在持续效果方面没有统计学上的显著差异;1.5分钟组手术期间细菌密度的平均(±标准差)对数10增加量为1.08±1.13 log10 cfu,3分钟组为0.95±1.27 log10 cfu(P = 0.708)。未记录到不良反应。

结论

在本临床试验中,使用含酒精洗手液进行外科手消毒,无论应用3分钟还是1.5分钟,细菌减少情况相似,这证实了在健康志愿者身上产生的实验数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验