Mehlhorn Heinz, Walldorf Volker, Klimpel Sven, Schaub Günter, Kiel Ellen, Focke René, Liebisch Gabriele, Liebisch Arndt, Werner Doreen, Bauer Christian, Clausen Henning, Bauer Burkhard, Geier Martin, Hörbrand Thomas, Bätza Hans-Joachim, Conraths Franz J, Hoffmann Bernd, Beer Martin
Department of Parasitology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Parasitol Res. 2009 Aug;105(2):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1416-y. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
In the summer of 2006, a bluetongue epidemic started in the border area of Belgium, The Netherlands, and Germany, spread within 2 years over large areas of Western and Central Europe, and caused substantial losses in farm ruminants. Especially sheep and cattle were severely affected, leading to a case-fatality ratio of nearly 40% in sheep (Conraths et al., Emerg Inf Dis 15(3):433-435, 2009). The German federal ministry of food, agriculture, and consumer protection (BMELV) established a countrywide monitoring on the occurrence of the vectors of this virus, i.e., midges (family Ceratopogonidae) of the genus Culicoides. The monitoring was done on 91 sites, most of which were localized in the 150-km restriction zone that existed in December 2006. A grid consisting of 45 x 45 km(2) cells was formed that covered the monitoring area. As a rule, one trap was placed into each grid cell. The monitoring program started at the end of March 2007 and lasted until May 2008. It included the catching of midges by ultraviolet light traps-done each month from days 1 until 8, the selection of midges of the Culicoides obsoletus, Culicoides pulicaris group, and other Culicoides spp., the testing of midges for bluetongue virus (BTV) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the daily registration of weather data at each trap site for the whole monitoring period. The following main results were obtained: (1) Members of the C. obsoletus group were most commonly found in the traps, reaching often 3/4 of the catches. The African and South European vector of BTV-the species Culicoides imicola-was never found. (2) Members of the C. obsoletus group were most frequently found infected with BTV besides a few cases in the C. pulicaris group and other species. (3) Members of the C. obsoletus group were also found in winter. Their numbers were reduced, however, and they were caught mostly close to stables. Therefore, a true midge-free period does not exist during the year in Germany. (4) The amounts of midges caught daily depended on the weather conditions. If it was cold and/or windy, the traps contained only a few specimens. Since the months from January to May 2008 were considerably colder (at all farms) than their correspondents in 2007, the growing of the population of midges started 2-3 months later in 2008 than in 2007. (5) The highest populations of midges occurred in both years (2007 and 2008) during the months September and October. This corresponded significantly to the finding of highest numbers of infected midges and to the number of diseased cattle and sheep during these 2 months. (6) It is noteworthy that in general, the first virus-positive midges of the species C. obsoletus were found about 1 1/2 months later than the first clinical cases had occurred or later than the first PCR-proven virus-positive sentinel animals had been documented. In 2007, the first BTV-positive cattle were detected in May in North Rhine-Westphalia, while the first positive Culicoides specimens were only found in August on the same farm. Evaluating these main results of the entomological monitoring and the fact that many wild ruminants have also been infected with BTV, it becomes evident that bluetongue disease has become endemic in Central Europe, and that only constant effort including vaccination and perhaps also insecticidal protection of cattle and sheep will keep the economical losses at a reasonable level. The following papers (1-10) in this journal will contribute more details obtained from this worldwide unique entomological monitoring: Bartsch et al. 2009; Bauer et al. 2009; Stephan et al. 2009; Clausen et al. 2009; Hörbrand and Geier 2009; Kiehl et al. 2009; Mehlhorn et al. 2009; Kiel et al. 2009; Vorsprach et al. 2009; Balczun et al. 2009.
2006年夏天,蓝舌病疫情在比利时、荷兰和德国边境地区爆发,在两年内蔓延至西欧和中欧大片地区,给农场反刍动物造成了巨大损失。特别是绵羊和牛受到严重影响,绵羊的病死率接近40%(康拉茨等人,《新发传染病》15(3):433 - 435,2009年)。德国联邦食品、农业和消费者保护部(BMELV)对该病毒的传播媒介,即库蠓属(蠓科)的蠓进行了全国范围的监测。监测在91个地点进行,其中大部分位于2006年12月存在的150公里限制区内。形成了一个由45×45平方公里单元格组成的网格,覆盖监测区域。通常,每个网格单元放置一个诱捕器。监测计划于2007年3月底开始,持续到2008年5月。监测内容包括每月1日至8日用紫外线诱捕器捕捉蠓,挑选奥氏库蠓、普氏库蠓种群及其他库蠓属蠓,通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测蠓是否感染蓝舌病病毒(BTV),以及在整个监测期间每天记录每个诱捕点的天气数据。获得了以下主要结果:(1)奥氏库蠓种群的成员在诱捕器中最常被发现,通常占捕获量的3/4。BTV的非洲和南欧传播媒介——伊氏库蠓物种从未被发现。(2)除了普氏库蠓种群和其他物种中的少数病例外,奥氏库蠓种群的成员最常被发现感染BTV。(3)冬季也发现了奥氏库蠓种群的成员。然而,它们的数量减少了,并且大多在靠近畜舍的地方被捕获。因此,德国一年中不存在真正无蠓的时期。(4)每天捕获的蠓数量取决于天气条件。如果天气寒冷和/或有风,诱捕器中只有少数标本。由于2008年1月至5月比2007年同期(所有农场)寒冷得多,2008年蠓种群的增长比2007年晚2 - 3个月开始。(5)蠓种群数量在2007年和2008年的9月和10月达到最高。这与这两个月中感染蠓数量最多以及患病牛羊数量的发现显著对应。(6)值得注意的是,一般来说,首次发现奥氏库蠓物种的病毒阳性蠓比首次出现临床病例晚约1个半月,或比首次经PCR证实的病毒阳性哨兵动物记录晚。2007年,北莱茵 - 威斯特法伦州5月检测到首例BTV阳性牛,而同一农场8月才首次发现阳性库蠓标本。评估昆虫学监测的这些主要结果以及许多野生反刍动物也感染了BTV这一事实,很明显蓝舌病在中欧已成为地方病,只有持续努力,包括对牛羊进行疫苗接种以及可能的杀虫防护,才能将经济损失控制在合理水平。本期刊的以下论文(1 - 10)将提供从这一全球独特的昆虫学监测中获得的更多详细信息:巴尔施等人,2009年;鲍尔等人,2009年;斯特凡等人,2009年;克劳森等人,2009年;赫尔布兰德和盖尔,2009年;基尔等人,2009年;梅尔霍恩等人,2009年;基尔等人,2009年;沃斯普拉赫等人,2009年;巴尔祖恩等人,2009年。