Suppr超能文献

蓝舌病病毒属特异性血清学检测的挑战:没有一种检测方法适用于所有情况。

Challenges of BTV-Group Specific Serology Testing: No One Test Fits All.

作者信息

Di Rubbo Antonio, Agnihotri Kalpana, Bowden Timothy R, Giles Michelle, Newberry Kimberly, Peck Grantley R, Shiell Brian J, Zamanipereshkaft Marzieh, White John R

机构信息

The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, 5 Portarlington Road, East Geelong, VIC 3219, Australia.

出版信息

Viruses. 2024 Nov 21;16(12):1810. doi: 10.3390/v16121810.

Abstract

A newly formatted enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies to bluetongue virus (BTV) was developed and validated for bovine and ovine sera and plasma. Validation of the new sandwich ELISA (sELISA) was achieved with 949 negative bovine and ovine sera from BTV endemic and non-endemic areas of Australia and 752 BTV positive (field and experimental) sera verified by VNT and/or PCR. The test diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and diagnostic specificity (DSp) were 99.70% and 99.20%, respectively, for bovine sera, and 97.80% and 99.50%, respectively, for ovine sera. Comparable diagnostic performances were noted for the sELISA compared to four competition ELISAs. While the sensitivity of the sELISA remained unaffected by BTV-15 positive sera, the cELISAs were not as sensitive. BTV-15 is endemic to Australia, and early warning depends on sensitive diagnoses of all serotypes: endemic or incurring. The sELISA failed to discriminate against epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) antibodies, the most serologically related orbivirus to BTV. The ACDP cELISA and the IDEXX kit showed cross-reactivity with some EHDV serotypes, with the least cross-reactive being the VMRD and the IDVet kits. Cross-reactivities, however, were also detected in sera raised experimentally from 10 isolates of the 21 known non-BTV orbiviruses. In this case, the sELISA was the least affected, followed equally by the VMRD and IDVet kits, and the IDEXX kit and the ACDP cELISA were the least discriminatory. In addition to exclusivity assessment of the ELISAs, an inclusivity assessment was made for all ELISAs using well characterized reference sera positive for antibodies to all serotypes BTV-1 to BTV-24.

摘要

开发了一种新格式的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)用于检测蓝舌病病毒(BTV)抗体,并在牛和羊的血清及血浆中进行了验证。使用来自澳大利亚BTV流行和非流行地区的949份阴性牛和羊血清以及752份经病毒中和试验(VNT)和/或聚合酶链反应(PCR)验证的BTV阳性(田间和实验)血清对新的夹心ELISA(sELISA)进行了验证。牛血清的检测诊断敏感性(DSe)和诊断特异性(DSp)分别为99.70%和99.20%,羊血清的检测诊断敏感性和诊断特异性分别为97.80%和99.50%。与四种竞争ELISA相比,sELISA的诊断性能相当。虽然sELISA的敏感性不受BTV - 15阳性血清的影响,但竞争ELISA的敏感性较低。BTV - 15在澳大利亚为地方流行毒株,早期预警依赖于对所有血清型(地方流行或新发)的敏感诊断。sELISA无法区分与BTV血清学关系最密切的环状病毒—— epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus(EHDV)抗体。ACDP竞争ELISA和IDEXX试剂盒与某些EHDV血清型存在交叉反应,交叉反应最少的是VMRD和IDVet试剂盒。然而,在由21种已知非BTV环状病毒中的10种分离株实验产生的血清中也检测到了交叉反应。在这种情况下,sELISA受影响最小,其次是VMRD和IDVet试剂盒,而IDEXX试剂盒和ACDP竞争ELISA的鉴别能力最差。除了对ELISA进行排他性评估外,还使用针对BTV - 1至BTV - 24所有血清型抗体特征明确的参考血清对所有ELISA进行了包容性评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f814/11680153/73958155d8f2/viruses-16-01810-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验