Suppr超能文献

大学生领导力活动与大学药学预科阶段的关系。

Relationship between student leadership activities and prepharmacy years in college.

作者信息

Renzi Sara E, Sauberan Mark M, Brazeau Daniel A, Brazeau Gayle A

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Amherst, NY 14260, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Dec 15;72(6):149. doi: 10.5688/aj7206149.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a relationship exists between the number of years of college completed before entering pharmacy school and students' leadership involvement.

METHODS

All pharmacy students from 2004-2007 were classified based upon their educational level at time of matriculation: Early Assurance Program (EA); 2 years of college, but not EA (2Y); 3 or more years of college but no degree (3Y+); and bachelor's degree or higher (BD). In terms of leadership positions, students were classified as holding any office, total number of offices, and Phi Lambda Sigma (PLS) membership.

RESULTS

Students who entered the pharmacy program as EA students held 27.1% or 71 offices compared to 31.9% or 45 for 2Y, 26.8% or 39 for 3Y+ and 30.2% or 80 for BD students. Students selected for PLS were 12.1% for EA, 15.3% for 2Y, 16.1% for 3Y+ and 13.5% for BD. There was no significant relationship between prepharmacy education and leadership measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no relationship was found between pharmacy students' involvement in leadership activities and number of prepharmacy years of education, the importance of predictive factors and approaches to evaluate students' leadership activities and involvement merits further research.

摘要

目的

确定进入药学院之前完成大学学业的年限与学生的领导参与度之间是否存在关联。

方法

对2004年至2007年的所有药学专业学生,根据他们入学时的教育水平进行分类:早期保证计划(EA);完成两年大学学业但不属于EA(2Y);完成三年或三年以上大学学业但无学位(3Y+);拥有学士学位或更高学位(BD)。在领导职位方面,学生被分类为担任任何职位、担任职位总数以及Phi Lambda Sigma(PLS)成员。

结果

以EA学生身份进入药学项目的学生担任71个职位,占比27.1%;2Y学生担任45个职位,占比31.9%;3Y+学生担任39个职位,占比26.8%;BD学生担任80个职位,占比30.2%。被选入PLS的学生中,EA占12.1%,2Y占15.3%,3Y+占16.1%,BD占13.5%。药学预科教育与领导能力测评之间不存在显著关联。

结论

尽管未发现药学专业学生参与领导活动与药学预科教育年限之间存在关联,但预测因素以及评估学生领导活动和参与度的方法的重要性值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Relationship between student leadership activities and prepharmacy years in college.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Dec 15;72(6):149. doi: 10.5688/aj7206149.
2
Prepharmacy years in college and academic performance in a professional program.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Aug 15;71(4):69. doi: 10.5688/aj710469.
3
Why get involved? A cross-sectional survey of factors that influence student pharmacist membership in professional organizations.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2024 Jul;16(7):102098. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2024.04.014. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Diversity characteristics of the 2008-2009 pharmacy college application service applicant pool.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Oct 12;76(8):151. doi: 10.5688/ajpe768151.
5
Admission variables predictive of academic struggle in a PharmD program.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Feb 12;77(1):8. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7718.
7
Development of a Prepharmacy Underrepresented Mentorship Program for Undergraduate Students.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Sep;88(9):101260. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101260. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
9
Traditional matriculation vs an early assurance program: Effect on elected student leadership positions and academic performance.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Feb;10(2):154-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
10
An analysis of motivation factors for students' pursuit of leadership positions.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Feb 17;79(1):08. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79108.

引用本文的文献

2
Student perspectives on student leadership development programs.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 May 15;78(4):85. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78485.

本文引用的文献

1
Prepharmacy years in college and academic performance in a professional program.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Aug 15;71(4):69. doi: 10.5688/aj710469.
2
Predictors of academic success in a doctor of pharmacy program.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Oct 15;70(5):106. doi: 10.5688/aj7005106.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验