Suppr超能文献

大学预科阶段以及专业课程中的学业表现。

Prepharmacy years in college and academic performance in a professional program.

作者信息

Renzi Sara E, Krzeminski Melissa A, Sauberan Mark M, Brazeau Daniel A, Brazeau Gayle A

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Aug 15;71(4):69. doi: 10.5688/aj710469.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether there was a significant difference in the cumulative grade point average (GPA) of individual students at the end of their first 3 professional years in the doctor of pharmacy curriculum as a function of previous years in college.

METHODS

The cumulative GPA for the first- through third-professional years was calculated for the 2004-2007 graduating classes. Previous college education was classified as 2 years, 3 or more years without a bachelor's degree, and bachelor's degree or higher. Students with 2 years of prepharmacy education were classified as early assurance (EA) versus non-early assurance. Specifically, non-early assurance students were those who transferred in after 2 years but did not participate in the early assurance program. Statistical differences in the cumulative GPA were calculated using MANOVA with repeated measures followed by a LSD Post-Hoc test.

RESULTS

Students with a bachelor's degree performed better academically, especially in the first professional year of the program compared to those with other levels of education including those who entered through our EA program. There was a consistent decrease in cumulative GPA during the second-professional year, but no additional change in the third-professional year.

CONCLUSIONS

Students who obtain a bachelor's degree perform better academically presumably because of previous college experiences.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了药学博士课程前3个专业学年结束时,学生的累积平均绩点(GPA)是否因大学就读年限的不同而存在显著差异。

方法

计算了2004 - 2007届毕业生前3个专业学年的累积GPA。先前的大学教育分为2年、3年或以上但无学士学位以及学士学位或更高学历。接受2年药学预科教育的学生分为早期保证(EA)组和非早期保证组。具体而言,非早期保证学生是指在2年后转学进来但未参加早期保证计划的学生。使用重复测量的多变量方差分析(MANOVA)并随后进行最小显著差异(LSD)事后检验来计算累积GPA的统计学差异。

结果

拥有学士学位的学生在学业上表现更好,尤其是在课程的第一个专业学年,相比其他教育水平的学生,包括通过我们的EA计划入学的学生。在第二个专业学年,累积GPA持续下降,但在第三个专业学年没有进一步变化。

结论

获得学士学位的学生在学业上表现更好,可能是由于之前的大学经历。

相似文献

6
Shared responsibility for the education of pharmacy students.药学专业学生教育的共同责任。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Feb 15;75(4):223-229. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160708.
8
Sources of stress in a pharmacy student population.药学专业学生群体中的压力来源。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Apr;11(4):329-337. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验