Response to open peer commentaries for "Unnecessary time pressure in refusal of life-sustaining therapies".
作者信息
Cochrane Thomas I
机构信息
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):W5-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160902832153.
PMID:19326301
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Response to open peer commentaries for "Unnecessary time pressure in refusal of life-sustaining therapies".
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):W5-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160902832153.
2
A Jewish perspective on the refusal of life-sustaining therapies: culture as shaping bioethical discourse.
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):60-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160902790591.
3
Unnecessary time pressure in refusal of life-sustaining therapies: fear of missing the opportunity to die.
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):47-54. doi: 10.1080/15265160902718857.
4
The "window of opportunity:" helping parents make the most difficult decision they will ever face using an informed non-dissent model.
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):55-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160802716811.
5
The straight route to withholding hand-feeding and hydration.
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):57-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160802716829.
6
The Cruzan case revisited.
Conn Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;67(10):633-4.
7
The right to live: priority and the roles of physicians.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):69-70. doi: 10.1080/15265160903581817.
8
The case of Samuel Golubchuk and the right to be spared an excruciating death.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):67-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160903581841.
9
The locus of decision making for severely impaired newborn infants.
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Feb;11(2):39-40. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.540070.
10
Autonomy does not confer sovereignty on the patient: a commentary on the Golubchuk case.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):54-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160903581916.
Zotero 插件