Cochrane Thomas I
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):47-54. doi: 10.1080/15265160902718857.
During an illness requiring brief use of life-sustaining therapy (LST), patients and surrogates sometimes feel that LST must be withdrawn before it becomes unnecessary to avoid later being stuck living in a debilitated condition that the patient considers worse than death. This fear depends on the belief that the patient can legitimately refuse only artificial LST, so that if such therapies are no longer required, he or she will have missed the 'opportunity to die.' This fear of being stuck with life can lead to premature decisions to terminate LST and is unfounded because adequate ethical and moral justification exists for refusal of not just artificial LST, but also for refusal of natural LST, including oral hydration and nutrition.
在因疾病需要短期使用维持生命治疗(LST)期间,患者及其代理人有时会觉得,必须在LST变得不再必要之前就停止使用,以免日后陷入患者认为比死亡更糟糕的虚弱状态。这种担忧基于一种观念,即患者只能合理地拒绝人工LST,所以如果不再需要此类治疗,他或她就会错失“死亡的机会”。这种对维持生命状态的恐惧可能导致过早决定终止LST,而这种恐惧是毫无根据的,因为不仅拒绝人工LST,而且拒绝包括口服补液和营养在内的自然LST都有充分的伦理和道德依据。