Park Donguk, Stewart Patrica A, Coble Joseph B
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health/DHHS, 6120 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Apr;53(3):271-88. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep005.
An extensive literature review of published metalworking fluid (MWF) aerosol measurement data was conducted to identify the major determinants that may affect exposure to aerosol fractions (total or inhalable, thoracic and respirable) and mass median diameters (MMDs). The identification of determinants was conducted through published studies and analysis of published measurement levels. For the latter, weighted arithmetic means (WAMs) by number of measurements were calculated and compared using analysis of variance and t-tests. The literature review found that the major factors affecting aerosol exposure levels were, primarily, decade, type of industry, operation and fluid and engineering control measures. Our analysis of total aerosol levels found a significant decline in measured levels from an average of 5.36 mg m(-3) prior to the 1970s and 2.52 mg m(-3) in the 1970s to 1.21 mg m(-3) in the 1980s, 0.50 mg m(-3) in the 1990s and 0.55 mg m(-3) in the 2000s. Significant declines from the 1990s to the 2000s also were found in thoracic fraction levels (0.48 versus 0.40 mg m(-3)), but not for the respirable fraction. The WAMs for the auto (1.47 mg m(-3)) and auto parts manufacturing industry (1.83 mg m(-3)) were significantly higher than that for small-job machine shops (0.68 mg m(-3)). In addition, a significant difference in the thoracic WAM was found between the automotive industry (0.46 mg m(-3)) and small-job machine shops (0.32 mg m(-3)). Operation type, in particular, grinding, was a significant factor affecting the total aerosol fraction [grinding operations (1.75 mg m(-3)) versus other machining (0.95 mg m(-3))], but the levels associated with these operations were not statistically different for either the thoracic or the respirable fractions. Across all decades, the total aerosol fraction for straight oils (1.49 mg m(-3)) was higher than for other fluid types (soluble = 1.08 mg m(-3), synthetic = 0.52 mg m(-3) and semisynthetic = 0.50 mg m(-3)). Fluid type was also found to be partly associated with differences in the respirable fraction level. We found that the total aerosols were measured by a variety of sampling media, devices and analytical methods. This diversity of approaches makes interpretation of the study results difficult. In conclusion, both the literature review and the measurement data analyzed found that decade and type of industry, operation and fluid were important determinants of total aerosol exposure. Industry type and fluid type were associated with differences in exposure to the thoracic and respirable fraction levels, respectively.
我们进行了一项广泛的文献综述,回顾已发表的金属加工液(MWF)气溶胶测量数据,以确定可能影响气溶胶组分(总气溶胶或可吸入气溶胶、胸腔气溶胶和可呼吸气溶胶)暴露及质量中位直径(MMD)的主要决定因素。通过已发表的研究以及对已发表测量水平的分析来确定这些决定因素。对于后者,计算测量次数的加权算术平均值(WAM),并使用方差分析和t检验进行比较。文献综述发现,影响气溶胶暴露水平的主要因素首先是年代、行业类型、操作、加工液以及工程控制措施。我们对总气溶胶水平的分析发现,测量水平显著下降,从20世纪70年代之前的平均5.36毫克/立方米、70年代的2.52毫克/立方米,降至80年代的1.21毫克/立方米、90年代的0.50毫克/立方米以及21世纪的0.55毫克/立方米。从90年代到21世纪,胸腔气溶胶组分水平也出现显著下降(从0.48毫克/立方米降至0.40毫克/立方米),但可呼吸气溶胶组分水平未出现显著下降。汽车行业(1.47毫克/立方米)和汽车零部件制造业(1.83毫克/立方米)的WAM显著高于小型加工车间(0.68毫克/立方米)。此外,汽车行业(0.46毫克/立方米)和小型加工车间(0.32毫克/立方米)的胸腔WAM存在显著差异。操作类型,尤其是磨削,是影响总气溶胶组分的一个重要因素[磨削操作(1.75毫克/立方米)与其他加工操作(0.95毫克/立方米)相比],但这些操作所对应的胸腔或可呼吸气溶胶组分水平在统计学上并无差异。在所有年代中,纯油的总气溶胶组分(1.49毫克/立方米)高于其他加工液类型(可溶性加工液 = 1.08毫克/立方米,合成加工液 = 0.52毫克/立方米,半合成加工液 = 0.50毫克/立方米)。还发现加工液类型与可呼吸气溶胶组分水平差异也存在一定关联。我们发现,总气溶胶通过多种采样介质、设备和分析方法进行测量。这种方法的多样性使得研究结果难以解读。总之,文献综述和所分析的测量数据均表明,年代、行业类型、操作和加工液是总气溶胶暴露的重要决定因素。行业类型和加工液类型分别与胸腔和可呼吸气溶胶组分暴露差异相关。