Suppr超能文献

强化治疗与风险因素控制:迈向更具临床相关性的质量指标。

Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures.

作者信息

Selby Joseph V, Uratsu Connie S, Fireman Bruce, Schmittdiel Julie A, Peng Tiffany, Rodondi Nicolas, Karter Andrew J, Kerr Eve A

机构信息

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, California 94612, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):395-402. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31818d775c.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intensification of pharmacotherapy in persons with poorly controlled chronic conditions has been proposed as a clinically meaningful process measure of quality.

OBJECTIVE

To validate measures of treatment intensification by evaluating their associations with subsequent control in hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus across 35 medical facility populations in Kaiser Permanente, Northern California.

DESIGN

Hierarchical analyses of associations of improvements in facility-level treatment intensification rates from 2001 to 2003 with patient-level risk factor levels at the end of 2003.

PATIENTS

Members (515,072 and 626,130; age >20 years) with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and/or diabetes mellitus in 2001 and 2003, respectively.

MEASUREMENTS

Treatment intensification for each risk factor defined as an increase in number of drug classes prescribed, of dosage for at least 1 drug, or switching to a drug from another class within 3 months of observed poor risk factor control.

RESULTS

Facility-level improvements in treatment intensification rates between 2001 and 2003 were strongly associated with greater likelihood of being in control at the end of 2003 (P < or = 0.05 for each risk factor) after adjustment for patient- and facility-level covariates. Compared with facility rankings based solely on control, addition of percentages of poorly controlled patients who received treatment intensification changed 2003 rankings substantially: 14%, 51%, and 29% of the facilities changed ranks by 5 or more positions for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment intensification is tightly linked to improved control. Thus, it deserves consideration as a process measure for motivating quality improvement and possibly for measuring clinical performance.

摘要

背景

对于慢性病控制不佳的患者强化药物治疗,已被提议作为一项具有临床意义的质量过程指标。

目的

通过评估2001至2003年间35个凯撒医疗北加州医疗机构人群中治疗强化指标与后续高血压、高脂血症及糖尿病控制情况的关联,验证治疗强化指标。

设计

对2001至2003年间机构层面治疗强化率的改善情况与2003年末患者层面危险因素水平之间的关联进行分层分析。

患者

分别为2001年和2003年患有高血压、高脂血症和/或糖尿病的成员(515,072名和626,130名;年龄>20岁)。

测量指标

每个危险因素的治疗强化定义为在观察到危险因素控制不佳的3个月内,所开药物种类数量增加、至少一种药物剂量增加或换用另一类药物。

结果

在对患者和机构层面协变量进行调整后,2001至2003年间机构层面治疗强化率的改善与2003年末处于控制状态的可能性显著相关(每个危险因素P≤0.05)。与仅基于控制情况的机构排名相比,纳入接受治疗强化的控制不佳患者的百分比后,2003年的排名发生了显著变化:分别有14%、51%和29%的机构在高血压、高脂血症和糖尿病方面的排名变动了5个或更多位次。

结论

治疗强化与控制改善紧密相关。因此,它值得作为一项推动质量改进以及可能用于衡量临床绩效的过程指标加以考虑。

相似文献

1
Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures.
Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):395-402. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31818d775c.
2
Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):588-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0554-8. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
5
Outpatient electronic health records and the clinical care and outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):482-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00004.
6
Therapy modifications in response to poorly controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):475-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00006.
8
Simultaneous control of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia in 2 health systems.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):645-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963553. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

2
Therapeutic inertia and contributing factors among ambulatory patients with hypertension.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04109-1.
4
Conceptual and methodological recommendations for assessing the empirical validity of process measures of health care quality.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14356. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14356. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
5
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S11-S19. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S001.
6
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Supple 1):S10-S18. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S001.
7
Racial-Ethnic Differences in Treatment Initiation for New Diagnoses of Perinatal Depression.
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Apr 1;74(4):341-348. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220173. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
8
Impact of Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure on Processes of Hypertension Care and Long-Term Blood Pressure Control.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 4;9(15):e016174. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016174. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
9
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: -.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S7-S13. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S001.
10
Clinic-Based Strategies to Reach United States Million Hearts 2022 Blood Pressure Control Goals.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jun;12(6):e005624. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005624. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
When more is not better: treatment intensification among hypertensive patients with poor medication adherence.
Circulation. 2008 Jun 3;117(22):2884-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724104. Epub 2008 May 27.
2
The role of clinical uncertainty in treatment decisions for diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood pressure.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):717-27. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00004.
3
Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):588-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0554-8. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Understanding uncontrolled hypertension: is it the patient or the provider?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Dec;9(12):937-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.07332.x.
9
Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 1;356(9):921-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa062860.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验