Selby Joseph V, Uratsu Connie S, Fireman Bruce, Schmittdiel Julie A, Peng Tiffany, Rodondi Nicolas, Karter Andrew J, Kerr Eve A
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, California 94612, USA.
Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):395-402. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31818d775c.
Intensification of pharmacotherapy in persons with poorly controlled chronic conditions has been proposed as a clinically meaningful process measure of quality.
To validate measures of treatment intensification by evaluating their associations with subsequent control in hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus across 35 medical facility populations in Kaiser Permanente, Northern California.
Hierarchical analyses of associations of improvements in facility-level treatment intensification rates from 2001 to 2003 with patient-level risk factor levels at the end of 2003.
Members (515,072 and 626,130; age >20 years) with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and/or diabetes mellitus in 2001 and 2003, respectively.
Treatment intensification for each risk factor defined as an increase in number of drug classes prescribed, of dosage for at least 1 drug, or switching to a drug from another class within 3 months of observed poor risk factor control.
Facility-level improvements in treatment intensification rates between 2001 and 2003 were strongly associated with greater likelihood of being in control at the end of 2003 (P < or = 0.05 for each risk factor) after adjustment for patient- and facility-level covariates. Compared with facility rankings based solely on control, addition of percentages of poorly controlled patients who received treatment intensification changed 2003 rankings substantially: 14%, 51%, and 29% of the facilities changed ranks by 5 or more positions for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, respectively.
Treatment intensification is tightly linked to improved control. Thus, it deserves consideration as a process measure for motivating quality improvement and possibly for measuring clinical performance.
对于慢性病控制不佳的患者强化药物治疗,已被提议作为一项具有临床意义的质量过程指标。
通过评估2001至2003年间35个凯撒医疗北加州医疗机构人群中治疗强化指标与后续高血压、高脂血症及糖尿病控制情况的关联,验证治疗强化指标。
对2001至2003年间机构层面治疗强化率的改善情况与2003年末患者层面危险因素水平之间的关联进行分层分析。
分别为2001年和2003年患有高血压、高脂血症和/或糖尿病的成员(515,072名和626,130名;年龄>20岁)。
每个危险因素的治疗强化定义为在观察到危险因素控制不佳的3个月内,所开药物种类数量增加、至少一种药物剂量增加或换用另一类药物。
在对患者和机构层面协变量进行调整后,2001至2003年间机构层面治疗强化率的改善与2003年末处于控制状态的可能性显著相关(每个危险因素P≤0.05)。与仅基于控制情况的机构排名相比,纳入接受治疗强化的控制不佳患者的百分比后,2003年的排名发生了显著变化:分别有14%、51%和29%的机构在高血压、高脂血症和糖尿病方面的排名变动了5个或更多位次。
治疗强化与控制改善紧密相关。因此,它值得作为一项推动质量改进以及可能用于衡量临床绩效的过程指标加以考虑。