• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效钙拮抗剂用于冠心病患者:一项荟萃分析。

Long-acting calcium antagonists in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Bangalore Sripal, Parkar Sanobar, Messerli Franz H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10019, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2009 Apr;122(4):356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.043.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.043
PMID:19332231
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in patients with coronary artery disease remains controversial, with reports of increased risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Short-acting CCBs have an unfavorable hemodynamic profile. The role of long-acting CCBs in patients with coronary artery disease is unknown.

METHODS

MEDLINE/CENTRAL/EMBASE database were searched from 1966 to August 2008 for randomized controlled trials of long-acting CCBs in patients with coronary artery disease with follow-up for at least 1 year. We extracted from the studies the baseline characteristics and 6 outcomes: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, and heart failure.

RESULTS

Of the 100 randomized controlled trials of CCBs in patients with coronary artery disease, 15 studies evaluating 47,694 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. When compared with the comparison group (including placebo), CCBs were not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.05), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.95-1.11), nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.06), or heart failure (RR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71-1.05), and with a 21% reduction in the risk of stroke (95% CI, 0.70-0.89) and 18% reduction in the risk of angina pectoris (95% CI, 0.72-0.94). When compared with placebo, CCBs resulted in a 28% reduction in the risk of heart failure (95% CI, 0.73-0.92). The results were similar for both dihydropyridines and nondihydropyridine CCBs.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with coronary artery disease, long-acting CCBs (either dihydropyridines or nondihydropyridines), were associated with a reduction in the risk of stroke, angina pectoris, and heart failure, with similar outcomes for other cardiovascular events as the comparison group.

摘要

背景

钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)在冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用仍存在争议,有报道称其会增加心肌梗死风险和全因死亡率。短效CCB具有不良的血流动力学特征。长效CCB在冠状动脉疾病患者中的作用尚不清楚。

方法

检索MEDLINE/CENTRAL/EMBASE数据库1966年至2008年8月间关于长效CCB用于冠状动脉疾病患者且随访至少1年的随机对照试验。我们从这些研究中提取了基线特征和6项结局指标:全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死、中风、心绞痛和心力衰竭。

结果

在100项关于CCB用于冠状动脉疾病患者的随机对照试验中,15项评估47694例患者的研究符合我们的纳入标准。与对照组(包括安慰剂)相比,CCB与全因死亡率增加风险无关(相对危险度[RR]0.99;95%置信区间[CI],0.94 - 1.05)、心血管死亡率(RR 1.03;95% CI,0.95 - 1.11)、非致死性心肌梗死(RR 0.96;95% CI,0.87 - 1.06)或心力衰竭(RR 0.86;95% CI,0.71 - 1.05),且中风风险降低21%(95% CI,0.70 - 0.89),心绞痛风险降低18%(95% CI,0.72 - 0.94)。与安慰剂相比,CCB使心力衰竭风险降低28%(95% CI,0.73 - 0.92)。二氢吡啶类和非二氢吡啶类CCB的结果相似。

结论

在冠状动脉疾病患者中,长效CCB(二氢吡啶类或非二氢吡啶类)与中风、心绞痛和心力衰竭风险降低相关,其他心血管事件的结局与对照组相似。

相似文献

1
Long-acting calcium antagonists in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.长效钙拮抗剂用于冠心病患者:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2009 Apr;122(4):356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.043.
2
Calcium channel blockers and cardiovascular outcomes: a meta-analysis of 175,634 patients.钙通道阻滞剂与心血管结局:对175,634例患者的荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2009 Jun;27(6):1136-51. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283281254.
3
Current status of safety and efficacy of calcium channel blockers in cardiovascular diseases: a critical analysis based on 100 studies.钙通道阻滞剂在心血管疾病中的安全性和有效性现状:基于100项研究的批判性分析
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2000 Sep-Oct;43(2):171-96. doi: 10.1053/pcad.2000.7010.
4
Use of calcium channel blockers in cardiovascular risk reduction: issues in Latin America.钙通道阻滞剂在降低心血管风险中的应用:拉丁美洲的问题。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(3):143-54. doi: 10.2165/11536120-000000000-00000.
5
Calcium channel blockers and coronary heart disease.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005 Aug;17(4 Suppl):6-15.
6
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease and absence of heart failure or left ventricular systolic dysfunction: an overview of long-term randomized controlled trials.冠心病且无心力衰竭或左心室收缩功能障碍患者使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:长期随机对照试验综述
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Apr 10;166(7):787-96. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.7.787.
7
Angiotensin II receptor blockers and myocardial infarction: an updated analysis of randomized clinical trials.血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂与心肌梗死:随机临床试验的最新分析
J Hypertens. 2009 May;27(5):941-6. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32832961ed.
8
Calcium channel blockade to prevent stroke in hypertension: a meta-analysis of 13 studies with 103,793 subjects.钙通道阻滞剂预防高血压患者中风:对13项研究、103793名受试者的荟萃分析
Am J Hypertens. 2004 Sep;17(9):817-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.06.002.
9
Benefit of early invasive therapy in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials.早期侵入性治疗在急性冠状动脉综合征中的益处:当代随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 3;48(7):1319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.050. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
10
Tissue ACE inhibitors for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with preserved left ventricular function: a pooled meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.组织型血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂用于左心室功能保留患者心血管疾病二级预防:随机安慰剂对照试验的汇总Meta分析
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep;12(3):192-204. doi: 10.1177/1074248407304791.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Differ by the Number of Antianginals for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease? Insights from the BARI 2D Trial.稳定型缺血性心脏病的抗心绞痛药物种类是否会影响临床结局和生活质量?来自 BARI 2D 试验的结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Mar 1;214:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.12.045. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
2
B-vitamin Treatment Modifies the Mortality Risk Associated with Calcium Channel Blockers in Patients with Suspected Stable Angina Pectoris: A Prospective Cohort Study.B 族维生素治疗可改变疑似稳定性心绞痛患者使用钙通道阻滞剂的死亡率风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Jul;118(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.04.033. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
A pathophysiological compass to personalize antianginal drug treatment.
一种病理生理学指南针,用于个性化抗心绞痛药物治疗。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Dec;18(12):838-852. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00573-w. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Treatment of stable ischaemic heart disease: the old and the new.稳定型缺血性心脏病的治疗:新旧方法
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020 Jun;22(Suppl E):E54-E59. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa060. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
5
Beta-Blockers, Calcium Channel Blockers, and Mortality in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂与稳定性冠心病患者的死亡率。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jan 29;22(3):12. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-1262-1.
6
β-blockers, calcium antagonists, and mortality in stable coronary artery disease: an international cohort study.β 受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂与稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的死亡率:一项国际队列研究。
Eur Heart J. 2019 May 7;40(18):1399-1407. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy811.
7
Follow-up of Antihypertensive Therapy Improves Blood Pressure Control: Results of HYT (HYperTension survey) Follow-up.降压治疗随访可改善血压控制:HYT(高血压调查)随访结果
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2017 Sep;24(3):289-296. doi: 10.1007/s40292-017-0208-1. Epub 2017 May 11.
8
Management standards for stable coronary artery disease in India.印度稳定型冠状动脉疾病管理标准
Indian Heart J. 2016 Dec;68 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S31-S49. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.11.320. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Angina treatments and prevention of cardiac events: an appraisal of the evidence.心绞痛治疗与心脏事件的预防:证据评估
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2015 Dec;17(Suppl G):G10-G18. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suv054. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Is amlodipine more cardioprotective than other antihypertensive drug classes?氨氯地平比其他类抗高血压药物更具心脏保护作用吗?
Korean J Intern Med. 2014 May;29(3):301-4. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.29.3.301. Epub 2014 Apr 29.