Prasad S Vishnu, Ballal Mamatha, Shivananda P G
Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2009 Apr-Jun;52(2):191-3. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.48914.
Detection of slime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be useful in understanding the virulence of this organism. Here, comparative studies of two phenotypic methods using the tube method and the spectrophotometric method for slime production from 100 clinically and 21 environmentally significant isolates of P. aeruginosa were performed. A total of 68 isolates were positive by either of the tests whereas only 34 were positive by both the tests. The tube method detected slime significantly in more number of isolates than the spectrophotometric method. The tube test was found to be superior to the spectrophotometric method in ease of performance, interpretation and sensitivity. Among the clinical isolates, systemic isolates produce less slime compared to wound, respiratory and urinary isolates. Isolates from the hospital environment produced more slime indicating that this virulence marker helps the organism to survive for longer periods and cause nosocomial infections.
检测铜绿假单胞菌中的黏液有助于了解该生物体的毒力。在此,对100株临床分离株和21株具有环境意义的铜绿假单胞菌分离株,采用试管法和分光光度法这两种表型方法进行了黏液产生的比较研究。共有68株分离株在其中一项测试中呈阳性,而两项测试均呈阳性的仅有34株。与分光光度法相比,试管法检测到黏液的分离株数量明显更多。发现试管法在操作简便性、结果解读和灵敏度方面优于分光光度法。在临床分离株中,与伤口、呼吸道和泌尿道分离株相比,全身感染分离株产生的黏液较少。医院环境中的分离株产生的黏液更多,表明这种毒力标志物有助于该生物体长期存活并引发医院感染。