Stauffer Virginia, Ascher-Svanum Haya, Liu Lin, Ball Tamara, Conley Robert
Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
BMC Psychiatry. 2009 Mar 31;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-9-13.
How long an antipsychotic is effective in maintaining response is important in choosing the correct treatment for people with schizophrenia. This post-hoc analysis describes maintenance of response over 24 or 28 weeks in people treated for schizophrenia with olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole.
This was a post-hoc analysis using data from 5 double-blind, randomized, comparative trials of 24 or 28 weeks duration in which olanzapine was compared to risperidone (1 study; N = 339), quetiapine (1 study; N = 346), ziprasidone (2 studies; N = 548 and 394) or aripiprazole (1 study; N = 566) for treatment of schizophrenia. For each study, time to loss of response in patients who met criteria for response at Week 8 and the proportion of patients who lost response following Week 8 were compared by treatment group. The number needed to treat (NNT) with olanzapine rather than comparator to avoid loss of one additional responder over 24 or 28 weeks of treatment was calculated for each study.
Time maintained in response was significantly longer (p < .05) for olanzapine compared to risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone. Olanzapine did not significantly differ from aripiprazole. The proportion of patients who lost response was significantly lower for olanzapine versus risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone (p < .05). NNTs to avoid one additional patient with loss of response with olanzapine versus risperidone, quetiapine and ziprasidone were favourable, ranging from 5 to 9.
During 24 and 28 weeks of treatment, the antipsychotics studied differed in the time that treated patients with schizophrenia remained in response and the proportion of patients who lost response. Olanzapine treatment resulted in a consistent and statistically significant advantage in maintenance of response compared to treatment with risperidone, quetiapine and ziprasidone; but not compared to treatment with aripiprazole.
抗精神病药物在维持疗效方面的有效时长对于为精神分裂症患者选择正确的治疗方法至关重要。这项事后分析描述了使用奥氮平、利培酮、喹硫平、齐拉西酮或阿立哌唑治疗精神分裂症的患者在24周或28周内的疗效维持情况。
这是一项事后分析,使用了5项为期24周或28周的双盲、随机、对照试验的数据,这些试验将奥氮平与利培酮(1项研究;N = 339)、喹硫平(1项研究;N = 346)、齐拉西酮(2项研究;N = 548和394)或阿立哌唑(1项研究;N = 566)进行比较,用于治疗精神分裂症。对于每项研究,比较了在第8周达到缓解标准的患者的缓解丧失时间,以及第8周后缓解丧失的患者比例,并按治疗组进行了比较。计算了每项研究中使用奥氮平而非对照药物治疗以避免在24周或28周治疗期间再出现一例缓解丧失患者所需的治疗人数(NNT)。
与利培酮、喹硫平及齐拉西酮相比,奥氮平的疗效维持时间显著更长(p < .05)。奥氮平与阿立哌唑无显著差异。奥氮平治疗后缓解丧失的患者比例显著低于利培酮、喹硫平及齐拉西酮(p < .05)。奥氮平与利培酮、喹硫平及齐拉西酮相比,避免再出现一例缓解丧失患者所需的NNT较为有利,范围为5至9。
在24周和28周的治疗期间,所研究的抗精神病药物在精神分裂症患者的疗效维持时间以及缓解丧失患者比例方面存在差异。与使用利培酮、喹硫平及齐拉西酮治疗相比,奥氮平治疗在疗效维持方面具有持续且具有统计学意义的优势;但与使用阿立哌唑治疗相比则无此优势。