Prakash S, Ambrosio E, Alguacil L F, Del Olmo N
Departamento de Farmacología, Tecnología y Desarrollo Farmacéutico, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo CEU, Urb. Montepríncipe, Boadilla del Monte, 28668 Madrid, Spain.
Neuroscience. 2009 Jun 30;161(2):342-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.061. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
Synaptic plasticity is considered a physiological substrate for learning and memory [Lynch MA (2004) Long-term potentiation and memory. Physiol Rev 84:87-136] that contributes to maladaptive learning in drug addiction [Schoenbaum G, Roesch MR, Stalnaker TA (2006) Orbitofrontal cortex, decision-making and drug addiction. Trends Neurosci 29:116-124]. Many studies have revealed that drug addiction has a strong hereditary component [Kosten TA, Ambrosio E (2002) HPA axis function and drug addictive behaviors: insights from studies with Lewis and Fischer 344 inbred rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 27:35-69; Uhl GR (2004) Molecular genetic underpinnings of human substance abuse vulnerability: likely contributions to understanding addiction as a mnemonic process. Neuropharmacology 47 (Suppl 1):140-147], however the contribution of the genetic background to drug-induced changes in synaptic plasticity has been scarcely studied. The present study reports on an analysis of long-term potentiation (LTP) and depotentiation in Lewis (LEW) and Fischer-344 (F344) rats, two inbred rat strains that show different proneness to drugs of abuse and are considered an experimental model of genetic vulnerability to addiction [Kosten TA, Ambrosio E (2002) HPA axis function and drug addictive behaviors: insights from studies with Lewis and Fischer 344 inbred rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 27:35-69]. The induction of saturated-LTP was similar in LEW and F344 rats treated with saline or cocaine. However, only slices from LEW saline-treated rats showed the reversal of LTP; thus, the depotentiation of saturated-LTP was not observed in cocaine-injected LEW rats and in F344 animals (treated either with cocaine or saline). These results suggest significant differences in hippocampal synaptic plasticity between Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.
突触可塑性被认为是学习和记忆的生理基础[林奇·马A(2004年)长时程增强与记忆。生理学评论84:87 - 136],它也导致药物成瘾中的适应不良学习[舍恩鲍姆·G、罗施·M·R、斯塔尔纳克·T·A(2006年)眶额皮质、决策与药物成瘾。神经科学趋势29:116 - 124]。许多研究表明药物成瘾有很强的遗传成分[科斯滕·T·A、安布罗西奥·E(2002年)下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺轴功能与药物成瘾行为:来自对刘易斯和费希尔344近交系大鼠研究的见解。心理神经内分泌学27:35 - 69;乌尔·G·R(2004年)人类药物滥用易感性的分子遗传学基础:对将成瘾理解为记忆过程的可能贡献。神经药理学47(增刊1):140 - 147],然而遗传背景对药物诱导的突触可塑性变化的贡献却鲜有研究。本研究报告了对刘易斯(LEW)和费希尔 - 344(F344)大鼠长时程增强(LTP)和去增强作用的分析,这两种近交系大鼠对滥用药物表现出不同的易感性,被认为是成瘾遗传易感性的实验模型[科斯滕·T·A、安布罗西奥·E(2002年)下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺轴功能与药物成瘾行为:来自对刘易斯和费希尔344近交系大鼠研究的见解。心理神经内分泌学27:35 - 69]。用生理盐水或可卡因处理的LEW和F344大鼠中,饱和LTP的诱导相似。然而,只有来自生理盐水处理的LEW大鼠的脑片显示出LTP的逆转;因此,在注射可卡因的LEW大鼠和F344动物(用可卡因或生理盐水处理)中未观察到饱和LTP的去增强作用。这些结果表明刘易斯大鼠和费希尔344大鼠在海马突触可塑性方面存在显著差异。