Dolle Jessica M, Daling Janet R, White Emily, Brinton Louise A, Doody David R, Porter Peggy L, Malone Kathleen E
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, M4-C308 Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Apr;18(4):1157-66. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1005. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
Little is known about the etiologic profile of triple-negative breast cancer (negative for estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/human epidermal growth factor), a breast cancer subtype associated with high mortality and inadequate therapeutic options. We undertook this study to assess the risk for triple-negative breast cancer among women 45 years of age and younger in relation to demographic/lifestyle factors, reproductive history, and oral contraceptive use. Study participants were ascertained in two previous population-based, case-control studies. Eligible cases included all primary invasive breast cancers among women ages 20 to 45 years in the Seattle-Puget Sound area, diagnosed between January 1983 and December 1992, for whom complete data was obtained for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor status (n = 897; including n = 187 triple-negative breast cancer cases). Controls were age matched and ascertained via random digit dialing. Oral contraceptive use > or =1 year was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk for triple-negative breast cancer (95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.3) and no significantly increased risk for non-triple-negative breast cancer (P(heterogeneity) = 0.008). Furthermore, the risk among oral contraceptive users conferred by longer oral contraceptive duration and by more recent use was significantly greater for triple-negative breast cancer than non-triple-negative breast cancer (P(heterogeneity) = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Among women < or =40 years, the relative risk for triple-negative breast cancer associated with oral contraceptive use > or =1 year was 4.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.9-9.3), whereas there was no significantly increased risk with oral contraceptive use for non-triple-negative breast cancer among women < or =40 years, nor for triple-negative breast cancer or non-triple-negative breast cancer among women 41 to 45 years of age. In conclusion, significant heterogeneity exists for the association of oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk between triple-negative breast cancer and non-triple-negative breast cancer among young women, lending support to a distinct etiology.
三阴性乳腺癌(雌激素受体/孕激素受体/人表皮生长因子均为阴性)是一种与高死亡率和有限治疗选择相关的乳腺癌亚型,目前对其病因学特征了解甚少。我们开展这项研究,以评估45岁及以下女性患三阴性乳腺癌的风险与人口统计学/生活方式因素、生殖史及口服避孕药使用情况之间的关系。研究参与者来自之前两项基于人群的病例对照研究。符合条件的病例包括1983年1月至1992年12月期间在西雅图 - 普吉特海湾地区确诊的20至45岁女性中的所有原发性浸润性乳腺癌患者,且已获取其雌激素受体、孕激素受体及人表皮生长因子状态的完整数据(n = 897;其中包括187例三阴性乳腺癌病例)。对照与病例年龄匹配,通过随机数字拨号确定。使用口服避孕药≥1年与三阴性乳腺癌风险增加2.5倍相关(95%置信区间为1.4 - 4.3),而对非三阴性乳腺癌风险无显著增加(P(异质性)= 0.008)。此外,口服避孕药使用时间越长及使用时间越近,三阴性乳腺癌患者由此产生的风险显著高于非三阴性乳腺癌患者(P(异质性)分别为0.02和0.01)。在年龄≤40岁的女性中,使用口服避孕药≥1年与三阴性乳腺癌相关的相对风险为4.2(95%置信区间为1.9 - 9.3),而年龄≤40岁的女性使用口服避孕药对非三阴性乳腺癌风险无显著增加,41至45岁女性使用口服避孕药对三阴性乳腺癌或非三阴性乳腺癌风险亦无显著增加。总之,年轻女性中,口服避孕药使用与乳腺癌风险之间的关联在三阴性乳腺癌和非三阴性乳腺癌之间存在显著异质性,这支持了其病因不同的观点。