Suppr超能文献

体能访谈测试的信度、效度与实用性。

Reliability, validity and utility of the Fitness Interview Test.

作者信息

McDonald D A, Nussbaum D S, Bagby R M

机构信息

Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 1991 Sep;36(7):480-4. doi: 10.1177/070674379103600703.

Abstract

Psychiatrists are being asked more and more often by the courts to determine whether or not criminal defendants are fit to stand trial. However, the Criminal Code provides few statutory guidelines on what constitutes fitness to stand trial. Perhaps as a result of the lack of standards, psychiatrists have typically relied on traditional clinical assessment procedures in determining whether or not an individual is fit to stand trial. In an effort to improve the quality and consistency of forensic assessments, researchers have designed instruments to assess fitness to stand trial. In Canada, the Fitness Interview Test (FIT) was developed for this purpose. This study evaluated the FIT for its validity, reliability and utility in the assessment of fitness. The FIT was found to have excellent interrater reliability and scale homogeneity. In addition, it was able to discriminate between groups of defendants rates as being fit and or unfit to stand trial. The scale did not seem to be differentially sensitive to the diverse facets of fitness, which may be attributed to the format and content of the scale items. Caution is advised in the use of the FIT pending revision of the scale.

摘要

法庭越来越频繁地要求精神科医生判定刑事被告是否适合受审。然而,《刑法》几乎没有提供关于什么构成适合受审的法定指导方针。或许由于缺乏标准,精神科医生在判定一个人是否适合受审时通常依赖传统的临床评估程序。为了提高法医评估的质量和一致性,研究人员设计了评估适合受审能力的工具。在加拿大,为此开发了适合性访谈测试(FIT)。本研究评估了FIT在评估适合性方面的有效性、可靠性和实用性。研究发现FIT具有出色的评分者间信度和量表同质性。此外,它能够区分被评定为适合或不适合受审的被告群体。该量表似乎对适合性的不同方面没有差异敏感性,这可能归因于量表项目的形式和内容。在量表修订之前,建议谨慎使用FIT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验