Dormandy John, Bhattacharya Mondira, van Troostenburg de Bruyn Anne-Ruth
Department of Clinical Vascular Research, St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Drug Saf. 2009;32(3):187-202. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932030-00002.
People with type 2 diabetes mellitus have an excess risk of macrovascular disease and a poorer prognosis. PROactive (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events) was a landmark study of secondary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in type 2 diabetes that suggested a beneficial effect of pioglitazone therapy on macrovascular outcomes. Previous studies have already shown that pioglitazone has a good safety and tolerability profile in people with type 2 diabetes, but PROactive provided an opportunity to assess tolerability and safety associated with long-term exposure in a vulnerable subpopulation at very high cardiovascular risk. This review discusses all the key safety and tolerability characteristics associated with pioglitazone therapy in PROactive. As in previous studies, pioglitazone was associated with typical, but manageable, increases in oedema (26.4% vs 15.1% for placebo) and weight gain (mean change of +3.8 kg vs -0.6 kg for placebo). Increased hypoglycaemia with pioglitazone was consistent with improved glycaemic control. Despite more reports of serious heart failure in the pioglitazone group (5.7% vs 4.1% for placebo), there was a proportional improvement in macrovascular outcomes among patients developing heart failure, and absolute rates of macrovascular events and mortality were similar to those in the placebo group. Liver function tests confirmed the hepatic safety of pioglitazone with long-term use and revealed a tendency to improved hepatic function, which may reflect reductions in liver fat. The comparative incidence of malignancies was similar; however, more cases of bladder neoplasm (14 vs 5) and fewer cases of breast cancer (3 vs 11) were observed in the pioglitazone versus placebo arms of the study. A higher rate of bone fractures observed among pioglitazone-treated female patients (5.1% vs 2.5%) warrants further investigation. Overall, safety and tolerability was predictable, and adverse events were not treatment limiting. These results suggest that any beneficial effects of pioglitazone on macrovascular outcomes are accompanied by good long-term tolerability in this population of very high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes and established CVD.
2型糖尿病患者发生大血管疾病的风险更高,预后更差。PROactive(吡格列酮大血管事件前瞻性临床试验)是一项具有里程碑意义的2型糖尿病继发性心血管疾病(CVD)预防研究,表明吡格列酮治疗对大血管结局有有益影响。此前的研究已经表明,吡格列酮在2型糖尿病患者中具有良好的安全性和耐受性,但PROactive提供了一个机会,来评估在心血管风险极高的脆弱亚组中与长期暴露相关的耐受性和安全性。本综述讨论了PROactive中与吡格列酮治疗相关的所有关键安全性和耐受性特征。与之前的研究一样,吡格列酮与水肿(26.4%对安慰剂组的15.1%)和体重增加(平均变化+3.8 kg对安慰剂组的-0.6 kg)的典型但可控制的增加有关。吡格列酮导致低血糖增加与血糖控制改善一致。尽管吡格列酮组严重心力衰竭的报告更多(5.7%对安慰剂组的4.1%),但发生心力衰竭的患者中大血管结局有相应改善,大血管事件和死亡率的绝对发生率与安慰剂组相似。肝功能检查证实了吡格列酮长期使用的肝脏安全性,并显示肝功能有改善趋势,这可能反映了肝脏脂肪的减少。恶性肿瘤的相对发生率相似;然而,在研究的吡格列酮组与安慰剂组中,观察到更多膀胱肿瘤病例(14例对5例)和更少乳腺癌病例(3例对11例)。在接受吡格列酮治疗的女性患者中观察到较高的骨折发生率(5.1%对2.5%),值得进一步研究。总体而言,安全性和耐受性是可预测的,不良事件并不限制治疗。这些结果表明,吡格列酮对大血管结局的任何有益影响在这群患有2型糖尿病和已确诊CVD的极高风险患者中都伴随着良好的长期耐受性。