Varghese G I, Purcaro M J, Motelow J E, Enev M, McNally K A, Levin A R, Hirsch L J, Tikofsky R, Paige A L, Zubal I G, Spencer S S, Blumenfeld H
Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8018, USA.
Brain. 2009 Aug;132(Pt 8):2102-13. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp027. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
Partial seizures produce increased cerebral blood flow in the region of seizure onset. These regional cerebral blood flow increases can be detected by single photon emission computed tomography (ictal SPECT), providing a useful clinical tool for seizure localization. However, when partial seizures secondarily generalize, there are often questions of interpretation since propagation of seizures could produce ambiguous results. Ictal SPECT from secondarily generalized seizures has not been thoroughly investigated. We analysed ictal SPECT from 59 secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures obtained during epilepsy surgery evaluation in 53 patients. Ictal versus baseline interictal SPECT difference analysis was performed using ISAS (http://spect.yale.edu). SPECT injection times were classified based on video/EEG review as either pre-generalization, during generalization or in the immediate post-ictal period. We found that in the pre-generalization and generalization phases, ictal SPECT showed significantly more regions of cerebral blood flow increases than in partial seizures without secondary generalization. This made identification of a single unambiguous region of seizure onset impossible 50% of the time with ictal SPECT in secondarily generalized seizures. However, cerebral blood flow increases on ictal SPECT correctly identified the hemisphere (left versus right) of seizure onset in 84% of cases. In addition, when a single unambiguous region of cerebral blood flow increase was seen on ictal SPECT, this was the correct localization 80% of the time. In agreement with findings from partial seizures without secondary generalization, cerebral blood flow increases in the post-ictal period and cerebral blood flow decreases during or following seizures were not useful for localizing seizure onset. Interestingly, however, cerebral blood flow hypoperfusion during the generalization phase (but not pre-generalization) was greater on the side opposite to seizure onset in 90% of patients. These findings suggest that, with appropriate cautious interpretation, ictal SPECT in secondarily generalized seizures can help localize the region of seizure onset.
部分性发作会使发作起始区域的脑血流量增加。这些局部脑血流量的增加可通过单光子发射计算机断层扫描(发作期SPECT)检测到,为癫痫发作定位提供了一种有用的临床工具。然而,当部分性发作继发全面性发作时,由于发作的传播可能产生模糊的结果,常常存在解释方面的问题。继发全面性发作的发作期SPECT尚未得到充分研究。我们分析了53例患者在癫痫手术评估期间获得的59次继发全面性强直阵挛发作的发作期SPECT。使用ISAS(http://spect.yale.edu)进行发作期与基线发作间期SPECT差异分析。根据视频/脑电图回顾,将SPECT注射时间分类为全面性发作前、全面性发作期间或发作后即刻。我们发现,在全面性发作前和全面性发作阶段,发作期SPECT显示脑血流量增加的区域明显多于无继发全面性发作的部分性发作。这使得在继发全面性发作中,50%的情况下通过发作期SPECT无法确定单一明确的发作起始区域。然而,发作期SPECT上脑血流量的增加在84%的病例中正确识别了发作起始的半球(左侧与右侧)。此外,当在发作期SPECT上看到单一明确的脑血流量增加区域时,80%的情况下这是正确的定位。与无继发全面性发作的部分性发作的研究结果一致,发作后期脑血流量增加以及发作期间或发作后脑血流量减少对癫痫发作起始的定位没有帮助。然而,有趣的是,在90%的患者中,全面性发作阶段(而非全面性发作前)发作起始对侧的脑血流量灌注不足更为明显。这些发现表明,经过适当谨慎的解释,继发全面性发作的发作期SPECT有助于定位癫痫发作起始区域。