Zhang Yuting, Adams Alyce S, Ross-Degnan Dennis, Zhang Fang, Soumerai Stephen B
Drug Policy Research Group at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):520-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.520.
Few data exist on the cost and quality effects of increased use of prior-authorization policies to control psychoactive drug spending among persons with serious mental illness. This study examined the impact of a prior-authorization policy in Maine on second-generation antipsychotic and anticonvulsant utilization, discontinuations in therapy, and pharmacy costs among Medicaid beneficiaries with bipolar disorder.
Using Medicaid and Medicare utilization data for 2001-2004, the authors identified 5,336 patients with bipolar disorder in Maine (study state) and 1,376 in New Hampshire (comparison state). With an interrupted time-series and comparison group design, longitudinal changes were measured in second-generation antipsychotic and anticonvulsant use; survival analysis was used to examine treatment discontinuations and rates of switching medications.
The prior-authorization policy resulted in an 8-percentage point reduction in the prevalence of use of nonpreferred second-generation antipsychotic and anticonvulsant medications (those requiring prior authorization) but did not increase use of preferred agents (no prior authorization) or rates of switching. The prior-authorization policy reduced total pharmacy reimbursements for bipolar disorder by $27 per patient during the eight-month policy period. However, the hazard rate of treatment discontinuation (all bipolar drugs) while the policy was in effect was 2.28 (95% confidence interval=1.36-4.33) higher than during the prepolicy period, with adjustment for trends in the comparison state.
The small reduction in pharmacy spending for bipolar treatment after the policy was implemented may have resulted from higher rates of medication discontinuation rather than switching. The findings indicate that the prior-authorization policy in Maine may have increased patient risk without appreciable cost savings to the state.
关于增加使用预先授权政策来控制严重精神疾病患者精神活性药物支出的成本和质量影响的数据很少。本研究考察了缅因州一项预先授权政策对双相情感障碍医疗补助受益人的第二代抗精神病药物和抗惊厥药物使用、治疗中断情况以及药房成本的影响。
利用2001 - 2004年医疗补助和医疗保险的使用数据,作者确定了缅因州(研究州)的5336名双相情感障碍患者和新罕布什尔州(对照州)的1376名患者。采用中断时间序列和对照组设计,测量第二代抗精神病药物和抗惊厥药物使用的纵向变化;使用生存分析来考察治疗中断情况和换药率。
预先授权政策导致非首选第二代抗精神病药物和抗惊厥药物(那些需要预先授权的药物)的使用患病率降低了8个百分点,但并未增加首选药物(无需预先授权)的使用或换药率。在八个月的政策期内,预先授权政策使双相情感障碍患者的药房报销总额每人减少了27美元。然而,在政策实施期间,双相情感障碍所有药物的治疗中断风险率比政策实施前高2.28(95%置信区间 = 1.36 - 4.33),已对对照州的趋势进行了调整。
政策实施后双相情感障碍治疗的药房支出略有减少,可能是由于停药率升高而非换药率升高所致。研究结果表明,缅因州的预先授权政策可能增加了患者风险,而该州并未实现可观的成本节约。