Jiang J Y, Wong M C S, Zhang X H, Fung H, Griffiths S, Mercer S
Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health and Department of Community and Family Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China.
J Hum Hypertens. 2009 Nov;23(11):735-42. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.22. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
We studied the profiles of all-cause and cardiovascular (CVS) mortality among users of different antihypertensive classes in a Chinese population. From electronic patient records, a cohort study was conducted among 18,338 patients who ever newly prescribed an alpha-blocker, thiazide diuretic, beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker (CCB) or agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) without drug discontinuation or switching in the public primary-care sector in a large Territory of Hong Kong during January 2004-June 2007. The odds ratios of mortality (all-cause and CVS) were evaluated according to the prescribed antihypertensive drug classes by Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. A total of 823 deaths (4.5%) were reported during the study period. The crude proportions of all-cause mortality were highest in alpha-blockers (6.2%) and CCB (5.7%), but lowest in beta-blockers (2.8%). Compared with CCB, patients on thiazide diuretics were shown to have statistically significantly lower all-cause (adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) 0.75, 95% CI 0.60, 0.93, P=0.010) and CVS mortality (aHR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21, 0.78, P=0.007), but the 95% CI of the odds ratios of the major drug classes overlapped. When each drug class was used as a reference group, or when patients with only uncomplicated hypertension were included, their respective 95% CI similarly overlapped. Antihypertensive drug classes were associated with statistically comparable odds of all-cause and CVS mortality. This finding from real-life clinical practice further supports the position statements from international guidelines, which recommend that the major antihypertensive drug classes are suitable for initiating pharmacotherapy for the management of hypertension.
我们研究了中国人群中不同类别降压药使用者的全因死亡率和心血管(CVS)死亡率情况。通过电子病历,在2004年1月至2007年6月香港某大片地区的公共基层医疗部门,对18338例服用过α受体阻滞剂、噻嗪类利尿剂、β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)或作用于肾素 - 血管紧张素系统(RAS)药物且未停药或换药的患者进行了队列研究。通过Cox比例风险回归分析,根据所开降压药类别评估死亡率(全因和CVS)的比值比。研究期间共报告823例死亡(4.5%)。全因死亡率的粗略比例在α受体阻滞剂(6.2%)和CCB(5.7%)中最高,而在β受体阻滞剂(2.8%)中最低。与CCB相比,服用噻嗪类利尿剂的患者全因死亡率(调整后风险比(aHRs)0.75,95%置信区间0.60,0.93,P = 0.010)和CVS死亡率(aHR 0.40,95%置信区间0.21,0.78,P = 0.007)在统计学上显著更低,但主要药物类别的比值比的95%置信区间存在重叠。当将每种药物类别作为参照组时,或者当仅纳入无并发症高血压患者时,它们各自的95%置信区间同样存在重叠。降压药类别与全因死亡率和CVS死亡率在统计学上具有可比的比值。这一来自实际临床实践的发现进一步支持了国际指南的立场声明,即推荐主要的降压药类别适用于启动高血压治疗的药物治疗。