Van der Walt Elizna M, Milczek Erika M, Malan Sarel F, Edmondson Dale E, Castagnoli Neal, Bergh Jacobus J, Petzer Jacobus P
Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009 May 1;19(9):2509-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.030. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
Previous studies have shown that (E)-8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) is a specific reversible inhibitor of human monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) and does not bind to human MAO-A. Since the small molecule isatin is a natural reversible inhibitor of both MAO-B and MAO-A, (E)-5-styrylisatin and (E)-6-styrylisatin analogues were synthesized in an attempt to identify inhibitors with enhanced potencies and specificities for MAO-B. The (E)-styrylisatin analogues were found to exhibit higher binding affinities than isatin with the MAO preparations tested. The (E)-5-styrylisatin analogues bound more tightly than the (E)-6 analogue although the latter exhibits the highest MAO-B selectivity. Molecular docking studies with MAO-B indicate that the increased binding affinity exhibited by the (E)-styrylisatin analogues, in comparison to isatin, is best explained by the ability of the styrylisatins to bridge both the entrance cavity and the substrate cavity of the enzyme. Experimental support for this model is shown by the weaker binding of the analogues to the Ile199Ala mutant of human MAO-B. The lower selectivity of the (E)-styrylisatin analogues between MAO-A and MAO-B, in contrast to CSC, is best explained by the differing relative geometries of the aromatic rings for these two classes of inhibitors.
先前的研究表明,(E)-8-(3-氯苯乙烯基)咖啡因(CSC)是人类单胺氧化酶B(MAO-B)的一种特异性可逆抑制剂,且不与人MAO-A结合。由于小分子异吲哚酮是MAO-B和MAO-A的天然可逆抑制剂,因此合成了(E)-5-苯乙烯基异吲哚酮和(E)-6-苯乙烯基异吲哚酮类似物,试图鉴定出对MAO-B具有更强效力和特异性的抑制剂。结果发现,(E)-苯乙烯基异吲哚酮类似物与所测试的MAO制剂相比,表现出更高的结合亲和力。(E)-5-苯乙烯基异吲哚酮类似物的结合比(E)-6-类似物更紧密,尽管后者表现出最高的MAO-B选择性。与MAO-B的分子对接研究表明,与异吲哚酮相比,(E)-苯乙烯基异吲哚酮类似物表现出的结合亲和力增加,最好的解释是苯乙烯基异吲哚酮能够连接酶的入口腔和底物腔。人类MAO-B的Ile199Ala突变体与类似物的结合较弱,这为该模型提供了实验支持。与CSC相比,(E)-苯乙烯基异吲哚酮类似物在MAO-A和MAO-B之间的选择性较低,这最好的解释是这两类抑制剂的芳香环相对几何形状不同。