Blijdorp Karin, Cransberg Karlien, Wildschut Enno D, Gischler Saskia J, Jan Houmes Robert, Wolff Eric D, Tibboel Dick
Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr Molewaterplein 60, 3015 GJ Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/cc7771. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a supportive cardiopulmonary bypass technique for patients with acute reversible cardiovascular or respiratory failure. Favourable effects of haemofiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass instigated the use of this technique in infants on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The current study aimed at comparing clinical outcomes of newborns on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with and without continuous haemofiltration.
Demographic data of newborns treated with haemofiltration during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were compared with those of patients treated without haemofiltration in a retrospective 1:3 case-comparison study. Primary outcome parameters were time on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, time until extubation after decannulation, mortality and potential cost reduction. Secondary outcome parameters were total and mean fluid balance, urine output in mL/kg/day, dose of vasopressors, blood products and fluid bolus infusions, serum creatinin, urea and albumin levels.
Fifteen patients with haemofiltration (HF group) were compared with 46 patients without haemofiltration (control group). Time on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was significantly shorter in the HF group: 98 hours (interquartile range (IQR) = 48 to 187 hours) versus 126 hours (IQR = 24 to 403 hours) in the control group (P = 0.02). Time from decannulation until extubation was shorter as well: 2.5 days (IQR = 0 to 6.4 days) versus 4.8 days (IQR = 0 to 121.5 days; P = 0.04). The calculated cost reduction was euro5000 per extracorporeal membrane oxygenation run. There were no significant differences in mortality. Patients in the HF group needed fewer blood transfusions: 0.9 mL/kg/day (IQR = 0.2 to 2.7 mL/kg/day) versus 1.8 mL/kg/day (IQR = 0.8 to 2.9 mL/kg/day) in the control group (P< 0.001). Consequently the number of blood units used was significantly lower in the HF group (P< 0.001). There was no significant difference in inotropic support or other fluid resuscitation.
Adding continuous haemofiltration to the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit in newborns improves outcome by significantly reducing time on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and on mechanical ventilation, because of better fluid management and a possible reduction of capillary leakage syndrome. Fewer blood transfusions are needed. All in all, overall costs per extracorporeal membrane oxygenation run will be lower.
体外膜肺氧合是一种用于急性可逆性心血管或呼吸衰竭患者的支持性心肺旁路技术。体外循环期间血液滤过的有利作用促使该技术在接受体外膜肺氧合的婴儿中得到应用。本研究旨在比较接受和未接受持续血液滤过的新生儿体外膜肺氧合的临床结局。
在一项回顾性1:3病例对照研究中,比较了在体外膜肺氧合期间接受血液滤过治疗的新生儿与未接受血液滤过治疗患者的人口统计学数据。主要结局参数为体外膜肺氧合时间、拔管后脱管时间、死亡率和潜在成本降低情况。次要结局参数为总液体平衡和平均液体平衡、以毫升/千克/天为单位的尿量、血管升压药剂量、血液制品和液体冲击输注量、血清肌酐、尿素和白蛋白水平。
15例接受血液滤过的患者(血液滤过组)与46例未接受血液滤过的患者(对照组)进行了比较。血液滤过组的体外膜肺氧合时间显著更短:98小时(四分位数间距(IQR)=48至187小时),而对照组为126小时(IQR=24至403小时)(P=0.02)。脱管至拔管的时间也更短:2.5天(IQR=0至6.4天),而对照组为4.8天(IQR=0至121.5天;P=0.04)。计算得出每次体外膜肺氧合运行成本降低5000欧元。死亡率无显著差异。血液滤过组患者需要的输血较少:0.9毫升/千克/天(IQR=0.2至2.7毫升/千克/天),而对照组为1.8毫升/千克/天(IQR=0.8至2.9毫升/千克/天)(P<0.001)。因此,血液滤过组使用的血液单位数量显著更低(P<0.001)。在正性肌力支持或其他液体复苏方面无显著差异。
在新生儿体外膜肺氧合回路中增加持续血液滤过可通过显著缩短体外膜肺氧合时间和机械通气时间来改善结局,这是因为更好的液体管理以及可能减少了毛细血管渗漏综合征。需要的输血更少。总体而言,每次体外膜肺氧合运行的总成本将更低。