Suppr超能文献

突尼斯的健康社会决定因素:以阿里亚纳为例的分析。

Social determinants of health in Tunisia: the case-analysis of Ariana.

机构信息

WHO Centre for Health Development, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2009 Apr 3;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few research projects have analyzed how social determinants of health impact cities in North Africa. The sustained growth in these countries has nevertheless proven to exacerbate health disparities and create many social and economic inequalities. This strategic analysis examines selected social determinants of health in a major urban centre of Tunisia, identifies the most influential stakeholders able to influence equity/inequity, and reviews the accomplishments and need for action to foster health equity.

METHODS

This analysis was performed through a literature review and participatory research methods that included focus groups discussions and interview with key informants.

RESULTS

Access to health care, changes in lifestyles, housing issues and gender-related inequities are prime, socially-determined elements that affect health in Ariana.

CONCLUSION

Recognition of emerging health issues is needed along with improved inter and intrasectoral coordination among stakeholders. The community-participatory approach used in this paper proved to be a useful scoping technique for this setting. A similar methodology could be used by other researchers as a first step toward health equity action at a city level.

摘要

背景

鲜有研究项目分析过健康的社会决定因素如何影响北非城市。然而,这些国家的持续增长已被证明加剧了健康差距,并造成了许多社会和经济不平等。本战略分析研究了突尼斯一个主要城市中心的部分健康社会决定因素,确定了最有影响力的利益相关者,以了解他们能够影响公平/不公平的程度,并审查了为促进健康公平而取得的成就和需要采取的行动。

方法

通过文献回顾和参与式研究方法进行了分析,包括焦点小组讨论和关键知情人访谈。

结果

获得医疗保健、生活方式的改变、住房问题和与性别相关的不平等,是影响阿里亚纳健康的主要社会决定因素。

结论

需要认识到新出现的健康问题,并改善利益攸关方之间的部门间和部门内协调。本文中使用的社区参与方法被证明是该环境中有用的范围界定技术。其他研究人员可以采用类似的方法,作为在城市层面实现健康公平行动的第一步。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验