• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗重度抑郁症:从治疗开始时单药治疗与联合治疗的比较

Mirtazapine and paroxetine in major depression: a comparison of monotherapy versus their combination from treatment initiation.

作者信息

Blier Pierre, Gobbi Gabriella, Turcotte Julie E, de Montigny Claude, Boucher Nathalie, Hébert Chantal, Debonnel Guy

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Avenue des Pins Ouest, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 1A1.

出版信息

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Jul;19(7):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.01.015. Epub 2009 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.01.015
PMID:19345072
Abstract

This double-blind study compared initial combination therapy against monotherapy using two antidepressant drugs with complementary mechanisms of action on the serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) systems. Sixty one adult patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of unipolar depression were randomized to receive mirtazapine (30 mg/day), paroxetine (20 mg/day), or the combination of both drugs for 6 weeks. Response at week 4 was defined as a 30% reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and at week 6 as a 50% reduction in the MADRS. Remission was defined as a reduction in the MADRS score to 10 points or less. After 4 weeks, non-responders in the monotherapy groups had their medication dose increased by 50%. After 6 weeks, non-responders on monotherapy had the second trial drug added to their current regimen. Non-responders on combination therapy had the dosage of both drugs increased by 50%. There was a significantly greater decrease in MADRS scores in the combination group compared to the monotherapy groups at days 28, 35 and 42, with a 10 point difference separating the combination from the monotherapies at day 42. Remission rates at week 6 were 19% on mirtazapine, 26% on paroxetine, and 43% on the combination. Fifteen patients in the mirtazapine arm and 10 in the paroxetine arm who did not respond had the other drug added to their current regimen, and 5 on the combination had an increase in dose of both drugs secondary to non-response. Of these 30 patients, approximately 50% went on to achieve remission in the subsequent 2 weeks. These results indicate that the combined use of two antidepressants was well tolerated and produced a greater improvement than monotherapy.

摘要

这项双盲研究比较了初始联合治疗与单药治疗,使用两种对5-羟色胺(5-HT)和去甲肾上腺素(NE)系统具有互补作用机制的抗抑郁药物。61名被诊断为DSM-IV单相抑郁症的成年患者被随机分为接受米氮平(30毫克/天)、帕罗西汀(20毫克/天)或两种药物联合治疗6周。第4周的反应定义为蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分降低30%,第6周定义为MADRS评分降低50%。缓解定义为MADRS评分降至10分或更低。4周后,单药治疗组中无反应者的药物剂量增加50%。6周后,单药治疗的无反应者在其当前治疗方案中添加第二种试验药物。联合治疗的无反应者两种药物的剂量均增加50%。与单药治疗组相比,联合治疗组在第28、35和42天的MADRS评分显著降低,在第42天联合治疗与单药治疗之间相差10分。第6周的缓解率在米氮平组为19%,帕罗西汀组为26%,联合治疗组为43%。米氮平组15名无反应者和帕罗西汀组10名无反应者在其当前治疗方案中添加了另一种药物,联合治疗组5名无反应者因无反应而增加了两种药物的剂量。在这30名患者中,约50%在随后的2周内实现缓解。这些结果表明,两种抗抑郁药物联合使用耐受性良好,比单药治疗产生更大的改善。

相似文献

1
Mirtazapine and paroxetine in major depression: a comparison of monotherapy versus their combination from treatment initiation.米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗重度抑郁症:从治疗开始时单药治疗与联合治疗的比较
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Jul;19(7):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.01.015. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
2
Comparisons of the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression: a double-blind, randomized pilot study in a Chinese population.比较文拉法辛缓释剂、米氮平、帕罗西汀治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效和耐受性:一项中国人群双盲、随机、先导研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;30(4):357-64. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181e7784f.
3
Dual-dual action? Combining venlafaxine and mirtazapine in the treatment of depression.双重双重作用?文拉法辛与米氮平联合治疗抑郁症。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;42(4):346-9. doi: 10.1080/00048670701881587.
4
[Comparative study of paroxetine and mianserin in depression in elderly patients: efficacy, tolerance, serotonin dependence].帕罗西汀与米安色林治疗老年抑郁症的比较研究:疗效、耐受性及5-羟色胺依赖性
Encephale. 2001 Jan-Feb;27(1):71-81.
5
A randomized, double-blind, 24-week study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and paroxetine in depressed patients in primary care.一项随机、双盲、为期24周的研究,比较米氮平和帕罗西汀在基层医疗中对抑郁症患者的疗效和耐受性。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 May;18(3):133-41. doi: 10.1097/01.yic.0000068045.82050.00.
6
Lithium but not carbamazepine augments antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine in unipolar depression: an open-label study.锂盐而非卡马西平可增强米氮平治疗单相抑郁的疗效:一项开放标签研究。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10(4 Pt 2):390-9. doi: 10.1080/15622970701849978.
7
A comparative study of the efficacy of long-term treatment with escitalopram and paroxetine in severely depressed patients.艾司西酞普兰与帕罗西汀对重度抑郁症患者长期治疗效果的比较研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1331-41. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115513.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine in treating major depressive disorder with anxiety symptoms: an 8-week open-label randomised paroxetine-controlled trial.米氮平治疗伴焦虑症状的重性抑郁障碍的疗效和耐受性:8 周开放标签随机帕罗西汀对照试验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Mar;65(3):323-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02624.x.
9
Mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablet versus sertraline: a prospective onset of action study.米氮平口腔崩解片与舍曲林:一项前瞻性起效研究
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Aug;23(4):358-64. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000085408.08426.05.
10
Resolution of sexual dysfunction during double-blind treatment of major depression with reboxetine or paroxetine.瑞波西汀或帕罗西汀双盲治疗重度抑郁症期间性功能障碍的缓解情况
J Psychopharmacol. 2006 Jan;20(1):91-6. doi: 10.1177/0269881105056666. Epub 2005 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
RE: A case of treatment-resistant depression in an older adult and a discussion of treatment options.主题:一例老年难治性抑郁症病例及治疗方案探讨
BJPsych Bull. 2023 Jun;47(3):182-183. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2023.21. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Combining Antidepressants vs Antidepressant Monotherapy for Treatment of Patients With Acute Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.联合抗抑郁药与抗抑郁药单药治疗急性抑郁症患者的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):300-312. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.4313.
3
Treatment-Resistant Depression in Poland-Epidemiology and Treatment.
波兰难治性抑郁症的流行病学与治疗
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 18;11(3):480. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030480.
4
A Preliminary Study of Different Treatment Strategies for Anxious Depression.焦虑性抑郁症不同治疗策略的初步研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Jan 4;18:11-18. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S320091. eCollection 2022.
5
Antidepressants in Alzheimer's Disease: A Focus on the Role of Mirtazapine.抗抑郁药在阿尔茨海默病中的应用:聚焦米氮平的作用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Sep 16;14(9):930. doi: 10.3390/ph14090930.
6
Mortality risk of antipsychotic augmentation for adult depression.抗精神病药增效治疗成人抑郁症的死亡风险。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239206. eCollection 2020.
7
Research on the Development of Theme Trends and Changes of Knowledge Structures of Drug Therapy Studies on Major Depressive Disorder Since the 21 Century: A Bibliometric Analysis.21世纪以来重度抑郁症药物治疗研究的主题趋势发展与知识结构变化研究:一项文献计量分析
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 10;11:647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00647. eCollection 2020.
8
The effects of intramuscular administration of scopolamine augmentation in moderate to severe major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.肌肉注射东莨菪碱增强疗法对中度至重度重度抑郁症的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jul 1;10:2045125320938556. doi: 10.1177/2045125320938556. eCollection 2020.
9
Prescribing for moderate or severe unipolar depression in patients under the long-term care of UK adult mental health services.为长期接受英国成人心理健康服务机构护理的患者开具中度或重度单相抑郁症的处方。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jun 15;10:2045125320930492. doi: 10.1177/2045125320930492. eCollection 2020.
10
Clinical guidelines for the management of treatment-resistant depression: French recommendations from experts, the French Association for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology and the fondation FondaMental.治疗抵抗性抑郁症管理的临床指南:法国专家、法国生物精神病学和神经精神药理学协会以及 FondaMental 基金会的法国建议。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2237-x.