Song Jae Yung, Demuth Katherine
Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Box 1978, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Lang Speech. 2008;51(Pt 4):385-402. doi: 10.1177/0023830908099071.
Children's early word productions often differ from the target form, sometimes exhibiting vowel lengthening when word-final coda consonants are omitted (e.g., dog /dog/ --> [d(c):]). It has typically been assumed that such minimal words lengthening compensates for a missing prosodic unit (a mora). However, this study raises the alternative hypothesis that vowel lengthening in early productions compensates for the missing coda segment. If lengthening selectively occurs with short/lax vowels but not long/tense vowels, this would provide support for the hypothesis that lengthening serves to preserve bimoraic or 'minimal word' structure. However, if lengthening occurs across the board, this would indicate that lengthening compensates for the omitted segment. In order to address this issue, matched word pairs produced with and without a coda were extracted from the spontaneous speech of three English-speaking children between the ages of 1 ;1 and 2;6. Phonetic analysis compared the duration of vowels in words with and without the coda. The results showed that two children lengthened both short and long vowels when the coda was omitted, whereas one child selectively lengthened only short vowels. The implications of these findings, both for the representation of prosodic words, and for theories of production more generally, are discussed.
儿童早期产出的单词往往与目标形式不同,有时在词尾韵尾辅音省略时会出现元音延长的情况(例如,dog /dog/ --> [d(c):])。通常认为,这种最小程度的单词延长是为了补偿缺失的韵律单位(一个音节)。然而,本研究提出了另一种假设,即早期产出中的元音延长是为了补偿缺失的韵尾部分。如果延长只发生在短元音/松元音上,而不是长元音/紧元音上,这将为延长用于保留双音节或“最小单词”结构的假设提供支持。然而,如果延长普遍发生,这将表明延长是为了补偿省略的部分。为了解决这个问题,从三名年龄在1;1至2;6岁之间的英语儿童的自发话语中提取了有韵尾和无韵尾的匹配单词对。语音分析比较了有韵尾和无韵尾单词中元音的时长。结果显示,两名儿童在省略韵尾时会延长短元音和长元音,而另一名儿童只选择性地延长短元音。本文讨论了这些发现对韵律词表征以及更普遍的生成理论的意义。