Hosogoshi Hiroki, Kodama Masahiro
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, University of Tsukuba, Institute of Psychology, Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2009 Feb;79(6):542-8. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.79.542.
The mental and physical health of defensive pessimists (DPs) is generally worse than that of optimists. However, some DPs who accept their pessimistic thinking style are in good health. This study examined the health of college students who were DPs related to how they accepted their thinking style. In Study 1 (F = 211, M = 131), self-esteem was compared among DPs, strategic optimists (SOs), and depressed persons (DEPs). In Study 2 (F = 376, M = 251, not indicated = 5), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ28) was compared among these groups. ANOVAs revealed that DPs were healthier than DEPs in self-esteem and on the GHQ28, but worse than SOs in self-esteem. However, ANCOVA examining self-esteem with acceptance of their thinking style as a covariate showed that DPs were better than DEPs and as good as SOs in health. Regarding the acceptance of their thinking style, DPs scored worse than SOs. This study concluded that DPs in better health had better acceptance of their pessimistic thinking style.
防御性悲观者(DPs)的身心健康状况通常比乐观主义者更差。然而,一些接受自己悲观思维方式的防御性悲观者健康状况良好。本研究考察了与接受自身思维方式相关的大学生防御性悲观者的健康状况。在研究1(F = 211,M = 131)中,比较了防御性悲观者、策略性乐观者(SOs)和抑郁者(DEPs)的自尊水平。在研究2(F = 376,M = 251,未指明 = 5)中,比较了这些组别的一般健康问卷(GHQ28)得分。方差分析显示,防御性悲观者在自尊水平和GHQ28得分上比抑郁者更健康,但在自尊方面比策略性乐观者差。然而,以对自身思维方式的接受程度作为协变量进行的协方差分析表明,防御性悲观者在健康方面比抑郁者更好,且与策略性乐观者相当。关于对自身思维方式的接受程度,防御性悲观者的得分比策略性乐观者低。本研究得出结论,健康状况较好的防御性悲观者对其悲观思维方式的接受程度更高。