Hauschild Axel, Agarwala Sanjiv S, Trefzer Uwe, Hogg David, Robert Caroline, Hersey Peter, Eggermont Alexander, Grabbe Stephan, Gonzalez Rene, Gille Jens, Peschel Christian, Schadendorf Dirk, Garbe Claus, O'Day Steven, Daud Adil, White J Michael, Xia Chenghua, Patel Kiran, Kirkwood John M, Keilholz Ulrich
University of Kiel, Kiel, Charité Berlin.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;27(17):2823-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7636. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
This phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in patients with advanced melanoma who had progressed on a dacarbazine- or temozolomide-containing regimen.
A total of 270 patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 plus intravenous carboplatin at area under curve 6 (AUC 6) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle followed by either placebo (n = 135) or oral sorafenib 400 mg (n = 135) twice daily on days 2 to 19. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary and tertiary end points included overall survival and incidence of best response, respectively.
The median PFS was 17.9 weeks for the placebo plus CP arm and 17.4 weeks for the sorafenib plus CP arm (hazard ratio, 0.91; 99% CI, 0.63 to 1.31; two-sided log-rank test P = .49). Response rate was 11% with placebo versus 12% with sorafenib. Dermatologic events, grade 3 thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and fatigue were more common in patients treated with sorafenib plus CP versus placebo plus CP.
In this study, the addition of sorafenib to CP did not improve any of the end points over placebo plus CP and cannot be recommended in the second-line setting for patients with advanced melanoma. Both regimens had clinically acceptable toxicity profiles with no unexpected adverse events. A trial of similar design for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma (intergroup trial E2603) is currently ongoing.
本III期随机双盲安慰剂对照研究旨在评估索拉非尼联合卡铂和紫杉醇(CP)用于接受过含达卡巴嗪或替莫唑胺方案治疗后病情进展的晚期黑色素瘤患者的疗效和安全性。
共270例患者被随机分配,在21天周期的第1天接受静脉注射紫杉醇225mg/m²加静脉注射卡铂,曲线下面积为6(AUC 6),随后在第2至19天,135例患者接受安慰剂,135例患者接受口服索拉非尼400mg,每日两次。主要疗效终点为无进展生存期(PFS);次要和三级终点分别为总生存期和最佳反应发生率。
安慰剂加CP组的中位PFS为17.9周,索拉非尼加CP组为17.4周(风险比,0.91;99%CI,0.63至1.31;双侧对数秩检验P = 0.49)。安慰剂组的缓解率为11%,索拉非尼组为12%。与安慰剂加CP组相比,索拉非尼加CP组治疗的患者中皮肤事件、3级血小板减少、腹泻和疲劳更为常见。
在本研究中,索拉非尼联合CP相比安慰剂联合CP并未改善任何终点,因此不推荐用于晚期黑色素瘤患者的二线治疗。两种方案的毒性特征在临床上均可接受,且未出现意外不良事件。目前正在进行一项针对晚期黑色素瘤患者一线治疗的类似设计试验(组间试验E2603)。