Steinberg Michael B, Greenhaus Shelley, Schmelzer Amy C, Bover Michelle T, Foulds Jonathan, Hoover Donald R, Carson Jeffrey L
Division of General Internal Medicine,, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):447-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00004.
Smokers with medical illnesses are at particular risk for complications caused by tobacco. Clinical trial data on the effectiveness of triple-combination pharmacotherapy for tobacco dependence treatment in these high-risk smokers are not available.
To evaluate extended duration of a triple-medication combination versus standard-duration therapy with the nicotine patch alone and 6-month abstinence rates in smokers with medical illnesses.
Randomized clinical trial from 2005 to 2007.
Single primary care setting.
127 smokers 18 years or older with predefined medical illnesses were recruited from the local community.
Participants were allocated by blocked randomization to receive either the nicotine patch alone for a standard 10-week, tapering course (n = 64) or the combination of nicotine patch, nicotine oral inhaler, and bupropion ad libitum (n = 63). Nonstudy staff, who used computer-generated tables, assigned participants by telephone. No study staff had access to the randomization tables before randomization, thus maintaining concealment. Participants and study personnel were not blinded to treatment assignment.
The primary outcome was 7-day, exhaled carbon monoxide-confirmed point abstinence at 26 weeks after target quit date. Secondary outcomes were the time to first relapse, duration of medication use, and adverse effects of medications. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis with participants who were lost to follow-up (patch alone [n = 13] and combination therapy [n = 18]) classified as still smoking.
Both treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics. Abstinence rates at 26 weeks were 35% (22 of 63 patients) for the combination group versus 19% (12 of 64 patients) for the patch-alone group (relapse benefit, 16% [95% CI, 1% to 31%]; P = 0.040). The adjusted odds ratio for abstinence in the combination group was 2.57 (CI, 1.05 to 6.32; P = 0.041). The median time to relapse was significantly longer in the combination group than in the patch-alone group (65 days vs. 23 days; P = 0.005). Some side effects occurred more frequently in the combination group (for example, insomnia [25% vs. 9%] and anxiety [22% vs. 3%]), but the proportion of participants who discontinued study medications because of adverse events was similar in both groups (6%).
Approximately 25% of participants were lost to follow-up (proportions were similar between treatment groups). Treatment personnel and participants were unblinded.
Flexibly dosed triple-combination pharmacotherapy for up to 6 months was more effective than standard-duration nicotine patch therapy for outpatient smokers with medical illnesses.
Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
患有内科疾病的吸烟者因烟草导致并发症的风险尤其高。目前尚无关于三联药物联合疗法对这些高危吸烟者治疗烟草依赖有效性的临床试验数据。
评估三联药物联合疗法与仅使用尼古丁贴片的标准疗程疗法相比,在患有内科疾病的吸烟者中延长治疗时间及6个月戒烟率的情况。
2005年至2007年的随机临床试验。
单一初级保健机构。
从当地社区招募了127名18岁及以上患有预定义内科疾病的吸烟者。
参与者通过区组随机化分配,接受标准的10周递减疗程的单独尼古丁贴片治疗(n = 64)或尼古丁贴片、尼古丁口腔吸入器和安非他酮随意组合治疗(n = 63)。使用计算机生成表格的非研究人员通过电话分配参与者。在随机分组前,没有研究人员能够获取随机分组表,从而保持了隐蔽性。参与者和研究人员对治疗分配未设盲。
主要结局是目标戒烟日期后26周经呼出一氧化碳确认的7天点戒烟率。次要结局是首次复发时间、用药持续时间和药物不良反应。分析采用意向性分析,将失访的参与者(单独贴片组[n = 13]和联合治疗组[n = 18])归类为仍在吸烟。
两个治疗组的基线特征相似。联合治疗组26周时的戒烟率为35%(63例患者中的22例),单独贴片组为19%(64例患者中的12例)(戒烟获益率为16%[95%CI,1%至31%];P = 0.040)。联合治疗组戒烟的调整优势比为2.57(CI,1.05至6.32;P = 0.041)。联合治疗组的复发中位时间显著长于单独贴片组(65天对23天;P = 0.005)。联合治疗组某些副作用发生得更频繁(例如,失眠[25%对9%]和焦虑[22%对3%]),但因不良事件而停用研究药物的参与者比例在两组中相似(6%)。
约25%的参与者失访(治疗组之间比例相似)。治疗人员和参与者未设盲。
对于患有内科疾病的门诊吸烟者,灵活给药的三联药物联合疗法长达6个月比标准疗程的尼古丁贴片疗法更有效。
新泽西癌症研究所和罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会。