Stewart Duncan J, Kutryk Michael J B, Fitchett David, Freeman Michael, Camack Nancy, Su Yinghua, Della Siega Anthony, Bilodeau Luc, Burton Jeffrey R, Proulx Guy, Radhakrishnan Sam
Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mol Ther. 2009 Jun;17(6):1109-15. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.70. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
Despite the promise of proangiogenic gene therapy most clinical trials have failed to show benefit for the primary end point analysis. The NOGA angiogenesis Revascularization Therapy: assessment by RadioNuclide imaging (NORTHERN) trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of intramyocardial vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF165) gene therapy versus placebo, involving seven sites across Canada, designed to overcome major limitations of previous proangiogenic gene therapy trials. A total of 93 patients with refractory Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class 3 or 4 anginal symptoms were randomized to receive 2,000 microg of VEGF plasmid DNA or placebo (buffered saline) delivered via the endocardial route using an electroanatomical NOGA guidance catheter. There was no difference between the VEGF-treated and the placebo groups in the primary end point of change in myocardial perfusion from baseline to 3 or 6 months, assessed by single photon emission tomography (SPECT) imaging, although a significant reduction in the ischemic area was seen in both groups. Also, similar improvements in exercise treadmill time and anginal symptoms were seen in the VEGF and the placebo groups at 3 and 6 months, although again there were no differences between these groups. Despite the intramyocardial administration of a high "dose" of plasmid DNA using a percutaneous guidance catheter system, there was no benefit of VEGF gene therapy at 3 or 6 months for any of the end points studied.
尽管促血管生成基因治疗前景广阔,但大多数临床试验在主要终点分析中未能显示出益处。“心肌核素成像评估的NOGA血管生成血运重建疗法”(NORTHERN)试验是一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究,对比心肌内血管内皮生长因子(VEGF165)基因治疗与安慰剂,涉及加拿大各地的七个地点,旨在克服以往促血管生成基因治疗试验的主要局限性。共有93例加拿大心血管学会(CCS)3级或4级顽固性心绞痛症状患者被随机分组,通过心内膜途径使用电解剖NOGA引导导管接受2000微克VEGF质粒DNA或安慰剂(缓冲盐水)。通过单光子发射断层扫描(SPECT)成像评估,VEGF治疗组和安慰剂组在从基线到3个月或6个月心肌灌注变化的主要终点上没有差异,但两组缺血面积均有显著减少。此外,在3个月和6个月时,VEGF组和安慰剂组在运动平板时间和心绞痛症状方面有类似改善,不过两组之间同样没有差异。尽管使用经皮引导导管系统心肌内给予高“剂量”质粒DNA,但在3个月或6个月时,VEGF基因治疗对所研究的任何终点均无益处。