Pichardo R, Boulet L, Davignon J
Atherosclerosis. 1977 Apr;26(4):573-82. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(77)90124-1.
Some patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FHC, type II) are highly responsive to the cholesterol-lowering effect of clofibrate, while others are not only resistant to this effect but may even show an increase in plasma beta-lipoproteins. In an attempt to find an explanation for these striking differences, we have studied the pharmacokinetics of clofibrate in FHC patients at both extremes of responsiveness. The results disclosed several major differences between the two groups. Plasma clofibric acid (CPIB) measured during the chronic administration of the drug was significantly higher in the responders than in the non-responders, whether all patients in each group or only those with tendon xanthomas were considered. Plasma CPIB concentrations were negatively correlated with body weight in the responders but not in CPIB-resistant patients. They were also inversely proportional to decreases in plasma beta-lipoprotein cholesterol after chronic clofibrate administration in the responsive group, but directly proportional to increases in the non-responders. Increasing the dose of clofibrate from 2 to 3 g/day in CPIB-resistant patients always resulted in an increase in plasma CPIB levels, but this was followed in some patients by a decrease and in others by an increase in plasma beta-lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, so that the overall effect was not statistically significant. The half-life of plasma CPIB was measured over 48 h after a single 1-g dose of clofibrate in patients who had not received this drug for at least 3 weeks. Half-life was significantly longer in the responsive patients. In addition, the bioavailability and the rate of absorption of clofibrate tended to be higher in this group than in the resistant patients. We suspect that both groups differ not only in the metabolic handling of clofibrate but also in some aspect of their beta-lipoprotein cholesterol metabolism.
一些家族性高胆固醇血症(FHC,II型)患者对氯贝丁酯的降胆固醇作用反应强烈,而另一些患者不仅对此作用有抗性,甚至可能出现血浆β脂蛋白升高。为了找出这些显著差异的原因,我们研究了氯贝丁酯在反应性处于两个极端的FHC患者中的药代动力学。结果揭示了两组之间的几个主要差异。无论考虑每组中的所有患者还是仅考虑有肌腱黄色瘤的患者,在长期服用该药物期间测得的血浆氯贝酸(CPIB)在反应者中均显著高于无反应者。反应者的血浆CPIB浓度与体重呈负相关,而在CPIB抗性患者中则不然。在反应组中,它们也与长期服用氯贝丁酯后血浆β脂蛋白胆固醇的降低成反比,但在无反应者中与升高成正比。在CPIB抗性患者中将氯贝丁酯的剂量从2克/天增加到3克/天总是导致血浆CPIB水平升高,但随后一些患者的血浆β脂蛋白胆固醇浓度降低,而另一些患者则升高,因此总体效果无统计学意义。在至少3周未服用该药物的患者中,单次服用1克氯贝丁酯后48小时内测量血浆CPIB的半衰期。反应性患者的半衰期明显更长。此外,该组中氯贝丁酯的生物利用度和吸收速率往往高于抗性患者。我们怀疑两组不仅在氯贝丁酯的代谢处理上存在差异,而且在其β脂蛋白胆固醇代谢的某些方面也存在差异。