Suppr超能文献

[穿透性腹部创伤:西欧创伤中心20年经验]

[Penetrating abdominal trauma: 20 years experience in a Western European Trauma Center].

作者信息

Casali Marco, Di Saverio Salomone, Tugnoli Gregorio, Biscardi Andrea, Villani Silvia, Cancellieri Francesco, Ciaroni Valentina, Giordani Andrea, Gordini Giovanni, Baldoni Franco

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Maggiore Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2008 Nov-Dec;79(6):399-407.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of penetrating abdominal trauma in Western Europe is low. While non-operative management of blunt trauma has become the gold standard, the management of penetrating trauma is still controversial. Nonoperative management (NOM) and laparoscopy are currently used in selected patients, reducing the rate of unnecessary laparotomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a 20-years period from the Trauma Registry of our Trauma Center. 6523 patients were admitted for thoraco-abdominal trauma (5861 blunt vs 662 penetrating). We sorted the 114 patients with penetrating abdominal trauma in 2 groups for period (1989-2000 vs 2001-08, before and after the establishment of dedicated trauma unit) analyzing their demographics, clinical, therapeutic characteristics and the outcome in comparison.

RESULTS

In the latest period a significant increase in the incidence of penetrating trauma has been observed (doubled from 4.17/year up to 8.53/year, accounting now for 13.95% of all trauma laparotomies vs 7.8% in the past decade). A reduction of GSW (30% vs 12.5%, p = ns) occurred while no differences have been recorded in sex, age, prognostic parameters at arrival such as mean GCS (11.8 vs 13.2), ISS (22 vs 18), pH, BE and blood transfusion (6.4 vs 4.3 U) requirement. Interestingly a markedly significant change has been observed in the demographics of the victims (67.2% were of extra-EU origin vs 8% in the previous decade, p < 0.01). Recently the use of NOM spread widely in selected stable patients (21.9%). The failure rate of NOM was 14.3%. The percentage of unnecessary laparotomies decreased from 36% to 21.1% (p = ns). The introduction of laparoscopy was helpful in achieving a reliable, less invasive exploration, allowing detection of the peritoneal penetration and complete visceral exploration. Two GSW (4%) vs 3 (5.8%) cases of the latest years required Damage Control Surgery. A recent significant reduction in mortality and morbidity rate has been recorded (respectively 3.85% vs 18%, p < 0.05; 20% vs 39%, p = ns).

CONCLUSION

The recent immigration phenomenon and social changes contributed towards a significant rise in the incidence of penetrating trauma in Italy in the last decade associated to changes in the mechanism of injury. The increased use of NOM and laparoscopy contributed in decreasing the incidence of unnecessary laparotomies as well as overall morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

西欧穿透性腹部创伤的发生率较低。虽然钝性创伤的非手术治疗已成为金标准,但穿透性创伤的治疗仍存在争议。目前,非手术治疗(NOM)和腹腔镜检查用于部分特定患者,降低了不必要剖腹手术的发生率。

方法

我们回顾性分析了创伤中心创伤登记处20年期间的数据。6523例患者因胸腹联合伤入院(5861例钝性伤,662例穿透性伤)。我们将114例穿透性腹部创伤患者按时间段分为两组(1989 - 2000年与2001 - 2008年,分别为专门创伤单元设立前后),对比分析其人口统计学、临床、治疗特征及预后情况。

结果

在最近这段时间,穿透性创伤的发生率显著增加(从每年4.17例翻倍至每年8.53例,目前占所有创伤剖腹手术的13.95%,而过去十年为7.8%)。枪伤发生率有所下降(30%对12.5%,p = 无显著差异),但在性别、年龄、入院时的预后参数如平均格拉斯哥昏迷评分(11.8对13.2)、损伤严重度评分(22对18)、pH值、碱剩余及输血需求(6.4单位对4.3单位)方面未发现差异。有趣的是,受害者的人口统计学特征发生了显著变化(67.2%为欧盟以外地区的人,而前十年为8%,p < 0.01)。最近,NOM在部分病情稳定的患者中广泛应用(21.9%)。NOM的失败率为14.3%。不必要剖腹手术的比例从36%降至21.1%(p = 无显著差异)。腹腔镜检查的引入有助于实现可靠、侵入性较小的探查,能够发现腹膜穿透情况并完成内脏全面探查。近年来,两例枪伤(4%)与三例(5.8%)患者需要进行损伤控制手术。最近死亡率和发病率显著降低(分别为3.85%对18%,p < 0.05;20%对39%,p = 无显著差异)。

结论

最近的移民现象和社会变化导致意大利过去十年穿透性创伤的发生率显著上升,同时损伤机制也发生了变化。NOM和腹腔镜检查使用的增加有助于降低不必要剖腹手术的发生率以及总体发病率和死亡率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验