Campbell Jonathan D, Ramsey Scott D
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(3):199-209. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200927030-00003.
Published estimates for the treatment costs of breast cancer vary widely in methodology, perspective, patient populations and time horizon. We systematically summarized and analysed the published literature on per-patient costs of breast cancer, and highlight the perspectives, populations studied, time horizons and future directions for cost studies in breast cancer. This review included 29 US cost-of-illness studies for breast cancer. The estimates of lifetime per-patient costs of breast cancer ranged from $US20 000 to $US100 000. Payer perspectives were popular, while disease stages I and II were emphasized. The costs of initial and terminal therapy were greater than continuing care on a per-unit time basis, but continuing care accounts for the largest share of lifetime cost due to the relatively long survival of breast cancer patients. Costs of different surgeries were relatively similar (breast-conserving surgery vs mastectomy) but, all else equal, significant costs ($US23 000-31 000) were observed for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those who did not. Multiple studies confirmed that costs increased with increased stage of disease and costs decreased with increased age of diagnosis. The question remains whether or not lower costs for elderly patients are associated with lower quality of care. The patient, employer and societal perspectives were rarely presented. Experts in the field have recommended the societal perspective for US-based cost-effectiveness analyses. Most lifetime cost estimates were likely an underestimate for today's lifetime cost of treating breast cancer because of changes in practice patterns and improved survival. Further societal-based cost studies that differentiate costs by stage, age and treatment time (initial, continuing and terminal), and include the latest practice patterns would be valuable toward informing US-based cost-effectiveness studies for preventive as well as breast cancer treatment interventions.
已公布的乳腺癌治疗成本估算在方法、视角、患者群体和时间范围上差异很大。我们系统地总结并分析了已发表的关于乳腺癌患者人均成本的文献,并强调了乳腺癌成本研究的视角、研究人群、时间范围和未来方向。本综述纳入了29项美国乳腺癌疾病成本研究。乳腺癌患者终身人均成本的估算范围为2万美元至10万美元。支付方视角很常见,同时强调了疾病的I期和II期。初始和终末期治疗的成本按单位时间计算高于持续治疗,但由于乳腺癌患者的生存期相对较长,持续治疗在终身成本中占最大份额。不同手术的成本相对相似(保乳手术与乳房切除术),但在其他条件相同的情况下,接受辅助化疗的患者与未接受辅助化疗的患者相比,观察到了显著成本(2.3万美元至3.1万美元)。多项研究证实,成本随着疾病分期的增加而增加,随着诊断年龄的增加而降低。老年患者成本较低是否与医疗质量较低相关的问题仍然存在。患者、雇主和社会视角很少被提及。该领域的专家建议在美国进行成本效益分析时采用社会视角。由于实践模式的变化和生存率的提高,大多数终身成本估算可能低估了当今治疗乳腺癌的终身成本。进一步开展基于社会层面的成本研究,按分期、年龄和治疗时间(初始、持续和终末期)区分成本,并纳入最新的实践模式,对于为美国的预防性以及乳腺癌治疗干预措施的成本效益研究提供信息将具有重要价值。